Why Does a Local Minimum in Potential Energy Indicate Higher Stability?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 5K views
Bhargav
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Okay
We all know that the most stable state of a system (say an object undergoing SHM)is when it has minimum Potential Energy.
Can somebody tell me why a local minimum in the potential energy correponds to a higher stability than some other arbitary state?
(Not too much of quantum theory please!)

Cheers
Bhargav
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simple really. The force exerted by a given potential is equal to minus the gradient. If you're sitting at the bottom of a potential well the potential is rising when you move away from the minimum, thus the force will push you back to the minimum. If you're at the top of a potential hill then when you move away from the maximum the force will continue to push you away.

So minimums are stable because small motions away from the minimum will tend to push you back towards the minimum whereas maximums are unstable because small motions away from the maximum well tend to push you away from the maximum.