Why does a small air motor require more CFM than the compressor's rated watts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike_In_Plano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pneumatic Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency and specifications of a small air motor and its corresponding compressor. Participants explore the apparent discrepancy between the air motor's required CFM and the compressor's power consumption, touching on concepts of efficiency, standard conditions, and performance metrics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Mike questions why a small air motor rated at 3.5 shaft watts requires 4.3 CFM at 60 PSI, while the compressor consumes about 1200 watts to maintain this flow.
  • Some participants suggest that the CFM values may be quantified differently at the two ends, potentially due to varying definitions of "standard conditions" in different industries.
  • One participant notes that the air motor's efficiency appears low at 1.3%, and compares it to larger air motors which can achieve around 50% efficiency.
  • Mike revisits his calculations regarding the power needed for the motor, realizing he may have miscalculated the required shaft watts, leading to further questions about efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the efficiency of the air motor and compressor, with no consensus on the reasons for the discrepancies in CFM and power ratings. Multiple viewpoints on efficiency and performance metrics remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of understanding "standard conditions" and how they can vary, which may affect the interpretation of CFM ratings. There is also an acknowledgment of potential miscalculations in power requirements.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the efficiency of pneumatic systems, air motor specifications, and compressor performance metrics may find this discussion relevant.

Mike_In_Plano
Messages
700
Reaction score
35
I'm a sparky, so forgive my ignorance regarding many things mechanical...

I'm puzzled why a small air motor that's rated to put out about 3.5 shaft watts requires 4.3 CFM @ 60PSI while the compressor on the other end is rated to consume roughly 1200 watts to maintain the flow at the stated pressure.

Is it likely that I'm reading the specs incorrectly, are the CFM values quantified differently at the two ends, or is this process so horridly inefficient?

Best Regards,

- Mike
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Doesn't sound quite right. Why not show us what you're looking at so we have at least some clue how to help you?
 
When small compressor manufacturers use CFM, they're talking about the volumetric displacement of their machine, so if local temperature and pressure are equal to standard conditions, the CFM is equal to SCFM. Air motor manufacturers do basically the same thing, except here they're assuming that if the inlet temperature and discharge pressure are equal to standard conditions, the CFM is equal to SCFM. Note that what is meant by "standard conditions" can vary depending on what industry you are in. For the industrial gas industry, we generally use 14.7 psia and 70 F in the US.

The air motor you quote (60 psig inlet, 4.3 CFM, 3.5 W output) gives an efficiency of only 1.3%. I don't know about air motors this small, but I'd have expected a whole lot better. Larger air motors typically run around 50% from what I've seen, though the smaller ones (about 10 times larger than what you're referencing) may be as low as 10%. These are ballpark numbers, so you'll need to check individual units for efficiency.

The air compressor you quote (60 psig discharge, 4.3 CFM, 1200 W input) has an efficiency of about 39%, which isn't very good but for a machine this small, it's not that bad.
 
Thank you for the prompt reply.

The motor in question is a Micro Motors MMR-5000. I found the performance curves at:
http://www.airoil.com/micromotor.pdf
For the app, I was targeting about 25,000 RPM at 1.1oz-in of torque, which seems to be a sweet spot - halfway to unloaded speed.

I need about 3.5 shaft watts, but I think I messed up on the computation. I simply had:

P(watts) = torque * rev/sec

I think it should have been:

P = torque * rev/sec * 2pi

That gives me 20.3 shaft watts (more than needed / wanted), but it still doesn't look very efficient...

- Mike
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K