Why does a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates not radiate power?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A uniformly charged sphere oscillating between two radii does not radiate power due to the constancy of the electric field outside the sphere, which remains unchanged regardless of the oscillation frequency. The radiation of electromagnetic energy only occurs when there is a change in the electric field, which is not present in this scenario. Theoretical references such as J.D. Jackson's classical theory of radiation and the free online course on classical electrodynamics (CED) provide insights into this phenomenon, emphasizing that the charge distribution remains spherically symmetric and does not produce a dipole field necessary for radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic radiation principles
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution and symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study J.D. Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for in-depth theoretical insights
  • Explore the free online course on classical electrodynamics (CED) for foundational knowledge
  • Research the Larmor formula for radiation from accelerated charges
  • Investigate higher-order radiation components such as quadrupole radiation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetic theory, particularly those interested in radiation phenomena and charge dynamics.

yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Why does a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates between two radii at a certain frequency not radiate power?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer is that outside the sphere (distances greater than the larger radius) the electric field is constant.
 
Does the radiation only depend on the electric field outside of the sphere? Where can I find the expression of the power radiated?

Why does it not depend on other variables, such as the frequency of oscillation, or the radius?

Thanks for any replies.
 
yxgao said:
Does the radiation only depend on the electric field outside of the sphere? Where can I find the expression of the power radiated?

Why does it not depend on other variables, such as the frequency of oscillation, or the radius?

Thanks for any replies.

Applying Gauss's law,u find that,in the exterior of the sphere,the (electric) field is constant,BUT ONLY IN THE WHEN CASE THE (CHARGED) SPHERE STANDS STILL.If it moves,then it should be treated like any other moving charge and it will definitely radiate electromagnetic energy.You'll have to supply the frequency of the oscillations of the sphere and u can use classical theory of radiation (v.J.D.Jackson/L.D.Landau,E.Lifschitz) to estimate everything u want to know about the radiation (spectrum,power radiated,angular distribution,...).

Daniel.
 
So it does not matter that the sphere is constantly changing frequency? I haven't studied this topic in detail before. Is there an online reference that gives an introduction and relevant equations?

Thanks!
 
yxgao said:
So it does not matter that the sphere is constantly changing frequency? I haven't studied this topic in detail before. Is there an online reference that gives an introduction and relevant equations?

Thanks!


The fact that the frequency is not constant,but varying in time complicates the problem even more.
I don't know an good reference online for the theory of radiation,and especilally this kind of problem,except some CED courses as a whole.Which comprise a chapter of the theory of radiation as they should.

This is the famous free online course:
http://www.plasma.uu.se/CED

It's pretty good.Not comparable to J.D.Jackson's,but i think it should provide you with an idea about em radiation.

Daniel.

PS.Calcuations are not that easy.Beware! :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dexter,

I don't think the sphere will radiate. You are thinking of the Larmor formula for radiation by an accelerated charge but there is no component to the radiation field in the direction of the acceleration. Because the charge distribution is spherically symmetric there is no dipole component to the fields. There may be higher order components to the field (quadrupole, etc.) but there is no dipole field.
 
Is this correct: The sphere does not radiate because it is at rest and the charge is constant. Outside of the sphere, the electric field is constant. Radiation only depends on the rate of change of electric field. Therefore, the sphere does not radiate.


What if the sphere was moving at a speed v?
 
yxgao said:
Why does a uniformly charged sphere that oscillates between two radii at a certain frequency not radiate power?
If the charge redistributes itself constantly as the radius changes so that \sigma is uniform over the sphere at all times at all radii, there is no time dependent electric field. The only way the charge could redistribute itself that quickly is if the sphere was made of metal.

How do you get a metal sphere to oscillate its radius (and, therefore, surface area) and still keep the metal sphere intact? So I think this question deals with a theoretical situation, and is not a phenomenon that anyone has observed.

AM
 
  • #10
Does there exist a configuration of oscillating charges that radiates isotropically? How about a configuration of oscillating masses?
 
  • #11
What if the sphere was moving at a speed v?

If it were moving at a constant velocity then, no, it will not radiate. It will radiate only if it undergoes acceleration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K