Why Does Casimir's Trick Include Nonphysical Neutrino Helicities?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrinos
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Casimir's trick in electron neutrino scattering, specifically addressing the inclusion of nonphysical right-handed helicity states in the sum over input and output spin states. Participants clarify that while the interaction vertex projects onto left-handed states, the mathematical treatment allows for the inclusion of nonphysical states without contributing to the final result. The vertex structure is defined as γμ(1-γ5) for left-handed interactions, while a hypothetical scenario with only right-handed states would alter the vertex to γμ(1+γ5). This highlights the subtleties in the treatment of helicity states in quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with neutrino helicity and spin states
  • Knowledge of interaction vertices in particle physics
  • Basic grasp of the Dirac equation and gamma matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Casimir's trick in quantum field theory
  • Research the role of helicity states in neutrino interactions
  • Examine the properties of the Dirac operator and its projections
  • Learn about the differences between left-handed and right-handed neutrinos
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum field theorists, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of neutrino interactions and the mathematical frameworks governing them.

cipi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello

I was reading in Griffiths that in the case of electron neutrino scattering, one can apply Casimir's trick to sum over input and output spin states, including the neutrinos. My question is, how come you are allowed to include in the sum the nonphysical right handed helicity state ? And, yes, I understand that the final average takes into account that there is only one neutrino spin. But how does the nonphysical helicity not contribute mathematically, since it is included ?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The interaction vertex contains a projection onto the left-handed states.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and cipi
Orodruin said:
The interaction vertex contains a projection onto the left-handed states.
Thank you for answering, but trying to understand your answer, given that the vertex is γμ (1-γ5), in a world where only right handed states interacted, what would the vertex change to ?
 
cipi said:
Thank you for answering, but trying to understand your answer, given that the vertex is γμ (1-γ5), in a world where only right handed states interacted, what would the vertex change to ?
##\gamma^\mu (1+\gamma^5)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cipi
Orodruin said:
##\gamma^\mu (1+\gamma^5)##
Great, I wished missing logic links like this were better explained in the book for leisure readers like myself. Thanks.

I noticed 15 pages later that the book sort of explains it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K