MHB Why Does Checking if 2 Divides z1 Matter in Rational Solutions for X^2+Y^2=n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

I am looking at the following exercise:

In general, the equation $X^2+Y^2=n$, when $n \equiv 3 \pmod 4$, has no rational solution.

According to my notes:

Let $x=\frac{a}{b}, y=\frac{c}{d}, a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{Z}, b \cdot d \neq 0, (a,b)=1, (c,d)=1$, solution of $X^2+Y^2=n$.

$$\frac{a^2}{b^2}+\frac{c^2}{d^2}=n \Rightarrow (ad)^2+(bc)^2=n(bd)^2$$

That means, that the equation $X^2+Y^2=n Z^2$ has an integer solution $(x_1, y_1, z_1)=(ad, bc, bd)$.

Without loss of generality, we suppose that $gcd(x_1,y_1,z_1)=1$.

If $2 \mid z_1 \Rightarrow x_1^2+y_1^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 4 \Rightarrow (2 \mid x_1 \wedge 2 \mid y_1) \Rightarrow 2 \mid (x_1,y_1,z_1)=1, \text{ Contradiction}$

Therefore, $z_1=2k+1, z_1^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 4$

$$\Rightarrow n z_1^2 \equiv n \cdot 1 \pmod 4 \equiv 3 \pmod 4$$

$$\Rightarrow x_1^2+y_1^2 \equiv 3 \pmod 4, \text{ Contradiction.}$$

Why do we check if $2 \mid z_1$ ? (Sweating)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$z_1$ can either be odd or even. If even, $z_1 = 0 \pmod{2}$ and hence $z_1^2 = 0 \pmod{4}$ and $x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 0 \pmod{4}$ leading to a contradiction as above.

If $z_1$ is odd, i.e., $z_1 = 1 \pmod{2}$ then $z_1^2 = 1 \pmod{4}$ in which case $x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 3 \pmod{4}$ which also leads to a contradiction.

It's a standard method in number theory to check case-by-case modulo something and eliminate the possibilities. That's what they have done above.
 
mathbalarka said:
$z_1$ can either be odd or even. If even, $z_1 = 0 \pmod{2}$ and hence $z_1^2 = 0 \pmod{4}$ and $x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 0 \pmod{4}$ leading to a contradiction as above.

If $z_1$ is odd, i.e., $z_1 = 1 \pmod{2}$ then $z_1^2 = 1 \pmod{4}$ in which case $x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 3 \pmod{4}$ which also leads to a contradiction.

It's a standard method in number theory to check case-by-case modulo something and eliminate the possibilities. That's what they have done above.

Ok.. but how can I know which modulo I should take?

For example, at this exercise: Show that $x^2+y^2=3$ has no rational solution, why do we check if $3 \mid x_1$ and not if $2 \mid x_1$ ? (Thinking)
 
That completely depends on the problem you're doing. It's more or less a "trick" of number theory of some sort.

In the example $X^2 + Y^2 = 3Z^2$ (where $\text{gcd}(X, Y, Z) = 1$), considering modulo $3$ provides an obvious way to "chuck out" $Z$ from the modulo argument, giving $X^2 + Y^2 = 0 \pmod{3}$. However, this is possible if and only if $X^2 = Y^2 = 0 \pmod{3}$ (why?) in which case $X = Y = 0 \pmod{3}$. But then $X^2 + Y^2 = 0\pmod{9}$, thus $3 | Z^2 \Rightarrow 3|Z$. But then $\text{gcd}(X, Y, Z)=3 \neq 1$, contrary to our assumption.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top