Why Does Helium-3 Fission into H-3 and H Upon Neutron Absorption?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fission of Helium-3 into H-3 and H upon neutron absorption, exploring the mechanisms and probabilities involved in this nuclear reaction. Participants examine the stability of the Helium-4 nucleus and the energy dynamics at play, considering both theoretical and experimental aspects of the reaction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why Helium-3 fissions into H-3 and H instead of forming a more stable Helium-4 nucleus, suggesting that energy release might drive the reaction.
  • Others argue that the reaction is unlikely to proceed via the strong interaction alone, raising concerns about how energy is released without splitting the nucleus.
  • One participant notes the cross-section values for various isotopes, indicating that those capable of releasing energy through strong interactions have significantly higher cross-sections compared to those relying on electromagnetic interactions.
  • There is a suggestion that Helium-4 may form as a short-lived intermediate product before decaying into smaller components, prompting questions about the probability of different fission pathways.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the lifetime of the intermediate state, debating whether it can be accurately referred to as Helium-4.
  • One participant highlights the conservation of energy and momentum in nuclear reactions, noting that reactions with only one product tend to be rare, which could apply to the Helium-3 reaction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanisms and probabilities of the Helium-3 fission process. Multiple competing views remain regarding the stability of intermediate states and the likelihood of various reaction pathways.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the lifetime of intermediate states and the conditions under which certain reactions can occur, indicating that assumptions about stability and interaction types may influence their arguments.

murdakah
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm curious, why does Helium-3 fission into H-3 and H upon neutron absorption? Surely the He-4 nucleus configuration is more stable?
I get that the energy release may be what splits the nucleus, because it releases quite a lot of energy if it were to simply absorb the neutron.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the energy get released if it does not split up?
That reaction is possible, but I would expect it to be unlikely as it cannot proceed via the strong interaction alone.
 
mfb said:
How does the energy get released if it does not split up?
That reaction is possible, but I would expect it to be unlikely as it cannot proceed via the strong interaction alone.
I find the cross-section quoted as 55 microbarns - compared to the cross-section of proton emission, at 5500 barns.
Looking around the light isotopes, those which can release the energy by strong interaction - He-3, Li-6, B-10 and N-14 - have cross-section in barns to kilobarns. Those which cannot and only are capable of electromagnetic interaction and gamma ray emission - all H isotopes, Li-7, Be, B-11, C, N-15, O - have cross-section in microbarn to millibarn range.
 
Ok, so you're saying that its just much more likely to split up. Actually, now that you mention it, it makes sense now. So if I'm understanding correctly, the He-4 does form, but is only a short lived intermediate product, proceeding to decay into other smaller sub-components.
n + He-3 --> (He-4) --> H-3 + H-1 (or H-2 + H-2?)
What promotes the one fission reaction to be more probable than the other? ( Assuming of course D+D is a valid product)
 
I'm not sure if the intermediate state lives long enough to call it He-4.
The emission of a single nucleon (or alpha particle for heavier nuclei) is more likely than a split into two similar and bounds parts.
 
mfb said:
I'm not sure if the intermediate state lives long enough to call it He-4.
The emission of a single nucleon (or alpha particle for heavier nuclei) is more likely than a split into two similar and bounds parts.
I see. So just proton emission then. Thanks a lot. :)
 
murdakah said:
I'm curious, why does Helium-3 fission into H-3 and H upon neutron absorption? Surely the He-4 nucleus configuration is more stable?
I get that the energy release may be what splits the nucleus, because it releases quite a lot of energy if it were to simply absorb the neutron.

Nuclear reactions have to conserve both energy and momentum. When you only have one product it's not possible to conserve both except when the reactants have the right kinetic energies. Thus nuclear reactions with only 1 product tend to be rare. For instance why the d+d = He-4 reaction is also rare.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K