Why Does Melting Temperature Increase from Sodium to Aluminium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Periodic Trends
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons for the increase in melting temperature from sodium to aluminium, specifically exploring the roles of ions and atoms in this phenomenon. The scope includes conceptual understanding and potential implications for melting metals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for an explanation regarding the increase in melting temperature and its relation to ions versus atoms.
  • Another participant argues that ions are not relevant to the melting of metals.
  • A subsequent post reiterates the claim that ions are not relevant, emphasizing that the markscheme requires their mention.
  • Another participant points out that the markscheme explicitly states that ions must be mentioned, questioning if this allows for a definitive answer to the original question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the relevance of ions in the context of melting temperatures, with some insisting on their importance as per the markscheme, while others contest this view.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a reliance on the markscheme for guidance, which may introduce limitations based on its definitions and requirements. The exact nature of the relationship between melting temperature and the atomic or ionic structure remains unresolved.

jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Explain why the melting temperature increases from sodium to aluminium.

Why does it have to do with ions and not atoms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the question is about melting metals - ions have nothing to do with it.
 
Borek said:
If the question is about melting metals - ions have nothing to do with it.

The markscheme clearly stated that ions must be mentioned (the question is copied word for word)
 
jsmith613 said:
The markscheme clearly stated that ions must be mentioned (the question is copied word for word)

As it stated this as the answer, is it now possible to answer the original question
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K