Why Does Neutron Precess Despite q=0?

joex444
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
We all know that the magnetic moment is (gq/2m)J, so then why does a neutron precess in a magnetic field if q=0? This should cause the Hamiltonian to be 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neutrons precess in a magnetic field?
neutrons aren't even stable alone... can you elaborate on the background?
 
Hmm... ok, so I think I figured it out. Even though it is uncharged, it has charged quarks. Unlike the electron, neutrons aren't elementary so I can't think of them in that way. This explains why it does precess, as my paper indicates you can actually observe the interfence pattern caused by a 2pi rotation (which introduces the new wavefunction to be the negative of the original).
 
Last edited:
Your formula (gq/2m)J is a classical oversimplification. For neutral (or charged) particles,
the magnetic moment is written as (mu)e/2m, where e is the magnitude of the electron charge, and e/2m (the nuclear magneton for hadrons) is just a convenient scale factor. In these units mu=+2.79 for the proton and -1.91 for the neutron.
 
Quark charge has an appreciable effect on the motion of a neutron in a B-field?
Thats cool... can you site the article?
 

Thread 'importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment'

I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
View full post »

Thread 'Prof Mike Wiest's proposed link between quantum and consciousness'

I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Similar threads

A Proton Precession in Hydrogen-Rich Liquids
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Vector addition in spin orbit coupling
Replies
7
Views
2K
I How does QM explain that we see electrons circulating in a magnetic field?
Replies
33
Views
3K
I About spin precession in a magnetic field
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Where Does Larmor Precession Occur?
Replies
6
Views
3K
A Understanding spin precession in a magnetic field
Replies
5
Views
4K
Spin precession vs alignment in magnetic field
Replies
11
Views
6K
I What causes the precession of the equinox?
Replies
7
Views
2K
What causes the tilt angle of a precessing proton to change in a magnetic field?
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Hamiltonian of a particle in a magnetic field
Replies
10
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top