Why Does Particle Decay? | Explained with Fermi

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on neutron decay, specifically how a neutron transforms into a proton, electron, and antineutrino, as explained by Fermi's theory. It emphasizes that these particles are manifestations of different quantum fields, influencing each other in ways that defy classical perception. The decay process is probabilistic, with the neutron existing in a state that is mutually exclusive to its decay products. The conversation highlights the limitations of language in accurately describing complex physical phenomena and the necessity of mathematical frameworks for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of particle physics
  • Fermi's theory of particle interactions
  • Basic knowledge of quantum fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum field theory
  • Explore the mathematical models used in particle decay
  • Research the implications of neutron decay in nuclear physics
  • Learn about the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental processes of particle decay and the theoretical frameworks that describe them.

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
For instancr like neutron decaying into proton electron and antineutrino. I read it in a book that says that according to Fermi, each of these particles are vibrations in different quantum fields and that each field exerted a tiny influence on the others. Because of quantum mechanics, we can't percieve the gradual transfer; we observe the neutrons and we either see it as a neutron, or we see that its decayed with some probability that can be calculated. Is this the reason? If is so, I don't really get what it means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What it means is that you should not picture a neutron as some how made up of proton electron and antineutrino. Rather neutron disappears and these appear. In other words neutron and the moving proton, electron and antineutrino. These two states are of the same quantum entity. These states are mutually exclusive. Either you see this or that. their individual occurrence is truly governed by the law of probability. A neutron may decay within a particular time or may not decay at all.
 
All attempts to describe physical theories with words are problematic. You can shift the problems around a bit, but English will never give an accurate description of the physics.
Also, we cannot answer "why" questions on a fundamental level. Physics can find theories that allow to calculate things like the lifetime from other observations, but "a neutron decays" is always a purely experimental result. If it would not decay, we would have to change the theories.
 
Using words to describe physical phenomena is the same as model-building; a widely accepted method in science to develop hypotheses and theories.
The problem is that we have no words or other constructs to describe physical phenomena that lie outside of our direct experience. It is in these cases that we must develop mathematical descriptions with their rigor so that everybody can understand. Why a neutron decays outside of the nucleus of an atom is big question with immediate application to describe matter in all of its states.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K