Why Does Photon Energy Calculation Yield Different Results?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of photon energy and momentum for light with a wavelength of 500nm. The user calculated momentum using the formula momentum = h/wavelength, yielding 1.326 x 10-27 kg·m/s, and energy using E = hf, resulting in 3.96 x 10-19 J. An alternative method using p = mv led to a paradoxical energy result of 1.99 x 10-19 J, prompting confusion. The key takeaway is that the equation p = mv is not applicable to photons, which have zero mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's constant (h = 6.63 x 10-34 J·s)
  • Familiarity with the speed of light (c = 3.0 x 108 m/s)
  • Knowledge of the energy-frequency relationship (E = hf)
  • Basic principles of momentum and kinetic energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of massless particles in physics
  • Learn about the concept of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Research the derivation and applications of the energy-momentum relation for photons
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as the role of Planck's constant in energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and the properties of light, as well as anyone interested in understanding the calculations related to photon energy and momentum.

monstersaurou
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the momentum and energy of photons of light of wavelength 500nm. Usual data of h = 6.63 x 10-34 and c = 3.0 x 108ms-1

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


> To get momentum, i simply take momentum = h/wavelength = 1.326 x 10-27 kgms-1

> To get energy I use E = hf = 3.96 x 10-19 J

> However, i figured that an alternative way to get energy will be to use the equation p = mv. Since i have already calculated the momentum of my photon in the first step, and I know that the velocity of a photon is 3.0 x 108 ms-1, the mass of the photon will be 4.42 x 10-36 kg. With this mass in mind, I can now use KE = 0.5mv2 (m = 4.42 x 10-36, v = 3.0 x 108 ms-1). Eventually, i obtain a KE of 1.99 x 10-19 J.

> So there is now this paradox that E=hf gives me energy as 3.96 x 10-19 J, while the alternative method gives me energy of 1.99 x 10-19 J, which is half that of the former. I am pretty sure I am missing out on something here. Any idea? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
monstersaurou said:
However, i figured that an alternative way to get energy will be to use the equation p = mv.
The equation p = mv only applies to particles moving slowly compared to light speed. It certainly doesn't apply to photons, which have m = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K