Why does someone with normal vision not need glasses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xelb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the need for corrective lenses in individuals with varying vision capabilities, specifically addressing why those with "normal vision" do not require glasses, as well as the requirements for far-sighted and near-sighted individuals. The subject area pertains to optics and vision science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the reasons behind the necessity of corrective lenses for different vision types. Questions include the nature of "normal vision" and the optical principles that dictate the use of positive and negative focal lengths for far-sighted and near-sighted individuals, respectively.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made attempts to answer the questions, particularly regarding the conditions of far-sightedness and near-sightedness. However, there remains uncertainty about the concept of normal vision, with one participant offering a hypothesis that is acknowledged as reasonable by others. Guidance has been provided regarding the need for initial research before further assistance can be given.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relevant chapters on optics have not yet been covered in their coursework, which may contribute to the confusion surrounding these concepts.

Xelb
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


These are more-so explanation based and there is no math involved.

1) How come someone with "normal vision" does not require glasses?
2) Why does a far sighted person require glasses with a positive focal length?
3) Why does a near sighted person require glasses with a negative focal length?

It's bad enough that we have not covered the chapters dealing with optics in lecture yet, so some brief clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xelb said:

Homework Statement


These are more-so explanation based and there is no math involved.

1) How come someone with "normal vision" does not require glasses?
2) Why does a far sighted person require glasses with a positive focal length?
3) Why does a near sighted person require glasses with a negative focal length?

It's bad enough that we have not covered the chapters dealing with optics in lecture yet, so some brief clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Welcome to the PF.

We require that you show some effort in answering these schoolwork questions before we can offer much tutorial help. That means that if you have not covered this in your coursework yet, you should use the web or your textbook to do some reading about the basics involved. Then you should be able to take at least a afirst cut at answering the questions, and we can check your answers for you.

I did a Google search on Corrective Lenses Conceptual Questions, and this was one of the first hits (Google suggested the last two words of the search):

http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/eyeglass/

That should help you out...
 
So I was able to figure out the answers to questions 2 and 3.

For 1, however, I'm still not sure about it...but here's my guess:

Because a normal eye is neither elongated nor smaller, this means that neither a converging or diverging lens is needed in order to focus nearby objects on the retinal surface. On a normal eye, the image is produced normally on the retina because the refraction process begins when light reaches the eye.
 
Xelb said:
So I was able to figure out the answers to questions 2 and 3.

For 1, however, I'm still not sure about it...but here's my guess:

Because a normal eye is neither elongated nor smaller, this means that neither a converging or diverging lens is needed in order to focus nearby objects on the retinal surface. On a normal eye, the image is produced normally on the retina because the refraction process begins when light reaches the eye.

Sounds reasonable to me. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
18K