Why Does Subtracting a Vector's Angle from 90 Degrees Determine Its Complement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Click For Summary
Subtracting a vector's angle from 90 degrees determines its complement because the x and y axes are orthogonal in the Cartesian coordinate system. In the example, the airplane's angle of 22 degrees with respect to the y-axis leads to a complementary angle of 68 degrees with respect to the x-axis. This relationship is rooted in the properties of complementary angles, where the sum of the angles equals 90 degrees. A graphical approach using the unit circle can also demonstrate this relationship, confirming that switching the axes yields the same result. Understanding this concept is essential for accurately working with vector angles in physics and mathematics.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
In the example problem--which is dealing with vectors--an airplane is seen 215 km from an airport, making a 22 deg angle with respect to the y-axis. What the author does is simply subtract 22 deg from 90, to find the angle it makes with the x-axis. Why is the author allowed to do this? Does this have something to do with complementary angles? Could someone please explain this to me? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the x and y angles supposably are orthogonal. (as they are in the cartesian coordinate system with the standard inner product). So the answer is yes he can just do this if you want a more elaborate way of calculating that this is true do the following:

draw the quarter unit circle form the x to y axes. Then the line with an angle of 22 degrees w.r.t. the y-axis. it intersects the circle at the coordinate:
(sin x, cos x) where the argument of cos and sin is in degrees for convenience now.
now find x.

You know that if you flip around the axis i.e. you switch x and y you end up in the point (cos 22, sin 22) so we solve sin x = cos 22 and cos x = sin 22. thus x = 90 - 22 degrees.

Again this really isn't needed
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K