Why Does the Binomial Theorem Solution Differ from the Book's Answer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the discrepancies between a student's solution to a binomial theorem problem and the answer provided in their textbook. The student is attempting to expand the expression (x+y)n using the binomial coefficient formula C(n,r) = n!/r!(n-r)!, but struggles to incorporate the values of x and y correctly. Key insights include the realization that the sum of n elements can be interpreted as nx, and the importance of manipulating binomial coefficients to derive the expected value of successes in independent trials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Binomial Theorem and its expansion
  • Familiarity with binomial coefficients and factorials
  • Basic knowledge of expected value in probability
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and summations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Binomial Theorem and its applications
  • Learn about expected values in probability theory
  • Explore the concept of geometric series and their summation
  • Practice manipulating binomial coefficients in various algebraic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying combinatorics, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the Binomial Theorem and its applications in probability and algebra.

  • #31
Thanks, this ended up helping a lot =)

and sorry for digging up an old thread!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
gaganspidey said:
This is what I've been able to work out :

\sum_{r=0}^{n} r C^n_r x^r y^{n-r} <--------(given)

= \frac{n!}{(r-1)!(n-1-(r-1)!} x^r y^{n-r} <---------(cancelling the r's & adding & subtracting 1 & regrouping them)

= \frac{(nx)}{x} \frac{(n-1)!}{(r-1)!(n-1-(r-1)!} x^r y^{n-r} <-------(separating n & multiplying & dividing by x)

= (nx) C^{n-1}_{r-1} x^{r-1}y^{n-r} <-------( The R.H.S)

= nx(y+x)^{n-1} <--------(The L.H.S)

= nx <--------(Substuting the value x+y=1)


I think something's not right above, but what is it ?

Hmm, just a question: The solution seems impeccable, but what happened to the sigma notation after the first line?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K