Why Does the Newfound Planet WASP-17 Orbit Backward?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Planet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the peculiar retrograde orbit of the newly discovered planet WASP-17, which orbits its host star in the opposite direction of the star's rotation. Participants explore potential explanations for this phenomenon, including the possibility of a near-collision, and draw comparisons to other celestial bodies with unusual orbital characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that planets typically orbit stars in the same direction as the stars' rotation, with WASP-17 being an exception.
  • One participant suggests that a near-collision may have caused the retrograde orbit of WASP-17.
  • Another participant brings up Kapteyn's Star, which orbits the galaxy in a retrograde manner, indicating that retrograde motion is not unique to WASP-17.
  • Questions arise about how to measure the axis of rotation of distant stars, with one participant suggesting red/blue shift as a possible method.
  • There is a discussion regarding Venus, where one participant mistakenly claims it orbits backward, leading to clarifications about its rotation and orbit.
  • Participants explore the possibility of planet-sized objects being captured by a star's gravity to orbit against the star's rotation, questioning the likelihood of such occurrences.
  • One participant introduces the concept of tidal locking and provides a formula for calculating tidal locking times, while others express curiosity about the parameters involved.
  • Clarifications about the Love number and its relevance to tidal locking are provided, along with links to additional resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the nature of Venus's orbit and rotation, as well as the implications of tidal locking. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical aspects and hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of retrograde motion and the conditions under which planets can be captured by a star's gravity are not fully explored. The discussion also highlights the complexity of measuring distant stellar properties and the uncertainties surrounding tidal locking parameters.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
I was speaking with a friend about this today, I don't see a thread on it.

Newfound planet orbits backward

Planets orbit stars in the same direction that the stars rotate. They all do. Except one.

A newfound planet orbits the wrong way, backward compared to the rotation of its host star. Its discoverers think a near-collision may have created the retrograde orbit, as it is called.

The star and its planet, WASP-17, are about 1,000 light-years away. The setup was found by the UK's Wide Area Search for Planets (WASP) project in collaboration with Geneva Observatory.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32391095/ns/technology_and_science-space/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was just about to post this...

Very interesting.
 
That's nothing. Kapteyn's Star orbits the galaxy retrograde.
 
What happens when they flush their toilets?
 
Huckleberry said:
What happens when they flush their toilets?

They invert :O.
 
Huckleberry said:
What happens when they flush their toilets?

They get wet!
 
How does one measure the axis of rotation of a distant star?
 
Planets orbit stars in the same direction that the stars rotate. They all do. Except one.

A newfound planet orbits the wrong way, backward compared to the rotation of its host star. Its discoverers think a near-collision may have created the retrograde orbit, as it is called.

i wonder if they made a small mistake. i think venus orbits backwards also
 
Last edited:
flatmaster said:
How does one measure the axis of rotation of a distant star?

red/blue shift maybe?
 
  • #10
fourier jr said:
i wonder if they made a small mistake. i think venus orbits backwards also
No, Venus rotates backwards. It orbits forwards, like the rest of us.
 
  • #11
What is the chance that a planet-sized object may be captured exclusively by a star's gravitation, to orbit against the rotation of a the star? Perhaps smaller planetoids (like Pluto), difficult to see outside out own solar system, would be much more likely to be captured in the first place.

Can a planet in a binary system have a oscillating trajectory? My guess is that it would be more likely ripped apart or fall into a star.
 
  • #12
I deleted a 2012 doom post by a regular member and the responses. Please check your references before posting obvious stupid stuff. Snopes.com is a good place to start for obvious stuff. Thanks.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
No, Venus rotates backwards. It orbits forwards, like the rest of us.

thx for clearing that up. does that have anything to do with why a day on venus is longer than a year?
 
  • #14
fourier jr said:
thx for clearing that up. does that have anything to do with why a day on venus is longer than a year?

Yes.

It orbits the sun (definition of a year) every 224 days, but it rotates on its own axis (definition of a day) every 243 days. The fact that the axial rotation is slower than the orbit is tantamount to a retrograde rotation.
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
Yes.

It orbits the sun (definition of a year) every 224 days, but it rotates on its own axis (definition of a day) every 243 days. The fact that the axial rotation is slower than the orbit is tantamount to a retrograde rotation.

Venus has an actual physical retrograde sidereal rotation. As a result, its solar day is 116.5 days long.
 
  • #16
DaveC426913 said:
Yes.

It orbits the sun (definition of a year) every 224 days, but it rotates on its own axis (definition of a day) every 243 days. The fact that the axial rotation is slower than the orbit is tantamount to a retrograde rotation.

Janus said:
Venus has an actual physical retrograde sidereal rotation. As a result, its solar day is 116.5 days long.

Interesting. I wonder how long before it is tidally locked to the sun. Anybody know if there is an estimate of this?
 
  • #17
I read about this too on Wednesday, It was listed on http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8197683.stm" . So the planet's name WASP-17 has to do with the 'Wide Area Search for Planets' consortium of UK universities
Very interesting that we are able to deduce this kind of information for planets orbiting other stars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Redbelly98 said:
Interesting. I wonder how long before it is tidally locked to the sun. Anybody know if there is an estimate of this?

Hard to tell.
We don't know yet if there is a cause for a particular resonance between the Earth and Venus or whether it is just a coincidence. Venus' rotation and orbit are such that whenever Earth and Venus are in inferior conjunction (when they are at their closest to each other) Venus always presents the same side to the Earth.

There is a formula to calculate tidal locking times. it is

[tex]t= \frac{\omega a^6 I Q}{3GM^2 K_2 R^5}[/tex]

[itex]\omega[/itex] is the initial spin rate (radians/sec)
a is the semi-major axis of the orbit
I is the moment of inertia of the planet
Q is the dissipation factor
G is the gravitational constant
M is the mass of the sun
[itex]K_2[/itex] is the Love number
R is the radius of the planet.

However, Q and K2 are not well known except for the case of the Earth and moon.
 
  • #19
Janus said:
There is a formula to calculate tidal locking times. it is

[tex]t= \frac{\omega a^6 I Q}{3GM^2 K_2 R^5}[/tex]

[itex]\omega[/itex] is the initial spin rate (radians/sec)
a is the semi-major axis of the orbit
I is the moment of inertia of the planet
Q is the dissipation factor
G is the gravitational constant
M is the mass of the sun
[itex]K_2[/itex] is the Love number
R is the radius of the planet.
Love number?
 
  • #20
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
4K