Why Does the Shuttle-Ball Experiment Graph Show Only Straight Lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superconduct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Shuttle-Ball Experiment, specifically focusing on the graph that represents the relationship between electric potential energy and distance. Participants are exploring why the graph shows straight lines rather than concave upward slopes, considering the context of electric fields between parallel plates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between electric potential energy and distance, questioning the linearity of this relationship in the context of parallel plates. There is a discussion about the properties of the electric field and its uniformity, as well as the implications for force and work done on the ball.

Discussion Status

The discussion is actively exploring the concepts of electric potential energy and electric fields. Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the uniformity of the electric field and its effects on force and work, contributing to a deeper understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement, which involves a point charge between parallel plates, and are questioning the assumptions related to the nature of the electric field in this setup.

superconduct
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



20130322_192604.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



By the inverse proportionality relation between electric potential energy and distance, why is the graph composed of straight lines only but not concave upwards slopes? My sketch and the solution are attached below.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 568
  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 524
  • solution.jpg
    solution.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 534
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
superconduct said:
By the inverse proportionality relation between electric potential energy and distance, why is the graph composed of straight lines only but not concave upwards slopes?

When you say "inverse proportionality" between U and distance, are you thinking of U = kq1q2/r? That formula is for the potential energy of two point charges. But the problem deals with a point charge between parallel plates.
 
yeah I was thinking of that.
So the relation when in parallel plates is linear? Why??
 
Can you describe the properties of the electric field between the plates?
 
the electric field is nearly uniform and varies linearly across the plates?
 
superconduct said:
the electric field is nearly uniform and varies linearly across the plates?

E is (nearly) uniform, which means that it essentially doesn't vary at all as you move from one plate to the other. So, what can you conclude about the force acting on the ball as it moves between the plates?
 
The force is constant and work done varies linearly with distance?
 
superconduct said:
The force is constant and work done varies linearly with distance?

Yes, that's right.
 
thanks a lot for clearing my concepts :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K