Why don't we measure our weight in Newtons?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between weight and mass, emphasizing that weight should be measured in Newtons while mass is measured in kilograms or grams. It highlights that balance scales used in laboratories provide accurate mass measurements unaffected by local gravitational variations, while spring balances typically read in kilograms. The conversation also notes that while it is scientifically correct to express weight in Newtons, practical applications often lead to the use of kilograms. Users are encouraged to provide their weight in Newtons when asked, particularly in medical settings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the difference between weight and mass
  • Familiarity with measurement units: Newtons, kilograms, grams
  • Knowledge of balance scales and their calibration
  • Basic physics concepts related to gravity and force
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of mass and weight in physics
  • Learn about the calibration processes for different types of scales
  • Explore the implications of gravitational variations on weight measurements
  • Investigate the use of Newtons in various scientific applications
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching measurement concepts, professionals in scientific fields, and anyone interested in the accurate representation of weight and mass.

Jacinta
Messages
22
Reaction score
12
aren't you supposed to measure weight in Newtons? And mass in kilograms/grams?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson
Physics news on Phys.org
In some ways, it is probably more scientific to give the weight (mass) in "grams". When a balance type scale is used for very accurate mass measurements, like in a chemistry lab, the local value of the gravitation ## g ##, which can differ slightly depending on the geographical location has no effect on the measured result. ## \\ ## Editing: Meanwhile, a spring balance measures force=pounds. In M.K.S. , a spring balance should read Newtons, but if used as a "weight" scale, it's likely to read kilograms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rx7man
I think it's because we measure our weight, typically with a spring, but we really want to know our mass.
So the weighing equipment has been calibrated locally to show kilograms instead of Newtons.
It could show Newtons as well with a second scale, but generally that is left out. ;)
If we bring the same equipment elsewhere, it will have to be recalibrated.
The equipment that @Charles Link mentions measures indeed mass instead of weight, so it doesn't have to be recalibrated when moving elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Jacinta said:
aren't you supposed to measure weight in Newtons? And mass in kilograms/grams?
Next time you are asked, at a doctor's office or elsewhere, for your weight, you should definitely give it in Newtons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003, ISamson, Ibix and 1 other person
As long as you don't stray far from sea level and don't spend much time in free-fall, you can live with not making a clear distinction between weight and mass. You can treat it as a unit change, really.

Since most people live within a few hundred metres of sea level and spend negligible time in free-fall, it's only physicists (who spend a lot of time imagining out-of-the-ordinary situations) who need to be picky about it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson
Jacinta said:
aren't you supposed to measure weight in Newtons? And mass in kilograms/grams?

The simple answer is "yes." But when are things ever done as they are supposed to be done?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson
phinds said:
Next time you are asked, at a doctor's office or elsewhere, for your weight, you should definitely give it in Newtons.

Maybe I should just give them my mass instead.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
767
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K