Why E[x^2] = autocorrelation of x evaluated in 0 ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Autocorrelation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Wiener filter and the relationship between the expected value of the squared error and the autocorrelation function. Specifically, it addresses the equation E[s^2] = R_s(0), where R_s(0) represents the autocorrelation of the signal s evaluated at zero. The confusion arises from the lack of knowledge regarding the probability density function (PDF) of the original signal s, which complicates the computation of E[s^2]. The participants clarify that E(s(u)s(v)) = R(|u-v|) and confirm that for u=v, E(s^2(u)) equals R(0).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wiener filter concepts and applications
  • Familiarity with autocorrelation functions and their significance
  • Knowledge of expected value calculations in probability theory
  • Basic grasp of signal processing principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Wiener filter in detail
  • Learn about autocorrelation functions and their properties
  • Explore probability density functions and their role in signal analysis
  • Investigate the implications of E[s^2] in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, signal processing engineers, and students studying statistical signal processing and the Wiener filter methodology.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I was studying the derivation of the solution of Wiener filter from the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener_filter#Wiener_filter_problem_setup". There is a step I don't quite understand.
First, we define the square error between the estimated signal [itex]\hat{s}(t)[/itex] and the original true signal [itex]s(t)[/itex]:

[tex]e^2(t) = s^2(t) - 2s(t)\hat{s}(t) + s^2(t)[/tex]

then the authors calculate the mean value of [itex]e^2[/itex], that is [itex]E[e^2][/itex].
At this point I would note that:

[tex]E[e^2] = E[s^2] - 2E[s\hat{s}] + E[s^2][/tex]

Unfortunately we don't know the probability density function of the original signal [itex]s[/itex], so we cannot compute [itex]E[s^2][/itex]. However, the authors of the article seem to suggest that:

[tex]E[s^2]=R_s(0)[/tex]

where [itex]R_s(0)[/itex] is the autocorrelation function of s evaluated at 0 (though I might have misunderstood this).
Could anyone elaborate this point?

I thought that [itex]E[s^2]=\int f_{s}(x) x^2 dx[/itex], while [itex]R_s(0)=\int s(x)s(x)dx[/itex]
I don't see either, how they solve this problem without any knowledge on the p.d.f. of s.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
E(s(u)s(v)) = R(|u-v|) by definition. So if u=v we have E(s2(u)) = R(0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K