Why Gravitational Waves are Decomposed in Spin Weighted Spherical Harmonics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gravitational waves are decomposed using spin weighted spherical harmonics with a spin weight of -2 due to the nature of the graviton as a spin 2 particle. This decomposition is advantageous for simplifying algebraic calculations and providing deeper insights into the physics of gravitational waves, such as identifying multipole moments (monopole, dipole, quadrupole). While some classical treatments may not address this decomposition, it is a common practice in gravitational wave analysis, as evidenced by resources like arXiv: gr-qc/0511111.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational waves and their properties
  • Familiarity with spin weighted spherical harmonics
  • Knowledge of multipole expansions in physics
  • Basic grasp of algebraic techniques in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of spin weighted spherical harmonics
  • Study the role of multipole moments in gravitational wave physics
  • Explore alternative decompositions of gravitational waves
  • Examine the implications of graviton spin on gravitational wave analysis
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers involved in gravitational wave analysis and theoretical physics, particularly those interested in advanced mathematical techniques and their applications in understanding gravitational phenomena.

Skhaaan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Can someone tell me why gravitational waves are always decomposed in spin weighted spherical harmonics with spin weight -2 ?

I'm assuming you can hand wave the answer with something to do with the 'graviton' being a spin 2 particle but this isn't very satisfying to me.

Are there any other decompositions? Why not just regular spherical harmonics?

On a more basic level, why is it advantageous to decompose anything into spherical harmonics?
Is it just another analysis you can perform to get more insight into the physics such as what 'poles' there are.
i.e. mono, di, quad, etc...
Or is it also supposed to simplify the algebra too?

Many thanks in advance!

Sebastian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if you gave a reference to what you are referring to. At least in classical treatments of gravitational waves, most sources I've read simply do not do what you describe at all. For example:

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2011-1/

makes no mention of the decomposition you refer to.

I'm suspecting there is a particular reference you are reading that raised questions. In such case, you should always provide such a reference so people can look at what you are talking about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi, thanks for the reply and advice.

Sorry I didn't supply a reference, I didn't realize
that this decomposition was not more common.
It is very common in Gravitational Wave analysis.

This link gives a definition of the spin weighted spherical harmonics
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511111

I worked with this decomposition a lot but never understood the reason
for performing this decomposition. So then I wanted to ask
what is the reason for performing spherical harmonic decomposition
in general.

Maybe I will post again and ask the more general question on spherical harmonic decomposition

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K