Why is 1^(1/6) equal to cis(n*pi/3)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dsanz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression of the sixth root of unity, specifically examining why \(1^{(1/6)}\) can be represented as \( \text{cis}(n\pi/3) \) for integer values of \(n\). Participants explore the implications of this representation, including the nature of complex numbers and roots of unity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how \( \text{cis}(n\pi/3) \) can equal 1 for \(n=1\) despite having an imaginary part, questioning the equality of the real and imaginary components.
  • Others clarify that while \( \text{cis}(n\pi/3) \) is not equal to 1 for \(n=1\), raising it to the sixth power results in 1, indicating that these values are roots of unity.
  • One participant mentions the equation \(z^6 - 1 = 0\) and notes that there are six solutions, including both real and complex numbers.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of the "principal root," explaining that it refers to the primary or simplest root when discussing nth roots.
  • Further elaboration includes the use of De Moivre's Theorem to find all sixth roots of unity, emphasizing the periodic nature of these roots on the unit circle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the existence of multiple sixth roots of unity, but there is ongoing confusion and debate regarding the interpretation of these roots, particularly concerning the principal root and the nature of complex numbers involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the ambiguity in defining roots, particularly the distinction between the principal root and other roots, which may lead to misunderstandings in the context of complex numbers.

dsanz
Messages
42
Reaction score
2
Hi, I have a doubt concerning the following simple problem. This is actually a textbook problem, so the answer is correct. I just want to understand why this is.

1^(1/6) = exp ((1/6)(2n*[tex]\pi[/tex]i)) = cos (n*[tex]\pi[/tex]/3) + i sin (n*[tex]\pi[/tex]/3)

where n = 0,1,2,3,...

Ok, it is comprehensible that for n=0 we get cos(0) = 1, which is equal to 1^(1/6) = 1
However, I can't grasp why with n=1, for example, cis (n[tex]\pi[/tex]/3) is still equal to 1. In that case we would have cos([tex]\pi[/tex]/3) + i sin([tex]\pi[/tex]/3). How can that be equal to 1?! It has an imaginary part! Not even the real parts are equal.
The pi's appear as exponentials for some reason. Anyway, you get what I'm saying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_of_unity" while I look for the recent thread that discusses this...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dsanz said:
Hi, I have a doubt concerning the following simple problem. This is actually a textbook problem, so the answer is correct. I just want to understand why this is.

1^(1/6) = exp ((1/6)(2n*[tex]\pi[/tex]i)) = cos (n*[tex]\pi[/tex]/3) + i sin (n*[tex]\pi[/tex]/3)

where n = 0,1,2,3,...

Ok, it is comprehensible that for n=0 we get cos(0) = 1, which is equal to 1^(1/6) = 1
It just happens that cos(0) = 1. More to the point here is that [cos(0)]^6 = 1
dsanz said:
However, I can't grasp why with n=1, for example, cis (n[tex]\pi[/tex]/3) is still equal to 1.
No, it's not equal to 1, but [cis (1[itex]\pi[/itex]/3)]^6 does equal 1.
dsanz said:
In that case we would have cos([tex]\pi[/tex]/3) + i sin([tex]\pi[/tex]/3). How can that be equal to 1?! It has an imaginary part! Not even the real parts are equal.
The pi's appear as exponentials for some reason. Anyway, you get what I'm saying.
You can minimize this by using [ itex] tags for inline LaTeX.

The numbers cis (n[itex]\pi[/itex]/3) for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are the 6th roots of 1. Most of them are complex, but if you raise any of the to the 6th power, you get 1.
 
Yeah I get it. It's just very weird... you can conclude that 1^(1/6) is not equal to 1... because cis (pi/3) is not 1, but cis ((pi/3))^6 is.
 
Another way to look at this is that you are solving z^6 - 1 = 0. There are 6 values of z that are solutions, two of which are 1 and - 1. The other four are complex.
 
Aren't we getting into the "principle" root thing again?
 
The Chaz said:
Aren't we getting into the "principle" root thing again?
Which is why I'm trying to steer it in the direction of finding the solutions of z^6 - 1 = 0.
 
May I ask what the principle root thing is?
 
dsanz said:
May I ask what the principle root thing is?

No, you have to have at least ten posts to ask 2 questions in one thread.

Juuuuust kiddin.
When we say "the square root of 9", there is an implied understanding that we mean the POSITIVE square root. It can be ambiguous because there are two numbers that equal 9 when squared.

Extend this to the SIXTH root (or n-th root). There are 6 (or n) roots of 1 , but when we say the "sixth root of 1" (or "the n-th root"), we mean the "principle"/positive/simplest one.
There has to be a better way to determine it in general, as I'm sure (and hoping!) Mark44 will point out.
 
  • #10
OK, I'll give it a shot.

The problem as posed at the beginning of this thread is essentially "find all of the sixth roots of 1." That is equivalent to solving the equation z6 - 1 = 0 in the complex numbers. The principal sixth root of 1 is 1, but there are five others, one of which is -1. The other four are complex.

They can be found using the Theorem of De Moivre.

z6 - 1 = 0 ==> z6 = 1 = cos(0 + n*2pi) + isin(0 + n*2pi), n [itex]\in[/itex] I
==> z = (cos(n*2pi) + isin(n*2pi))1/6, n [itex]\in[/itex] I
==> z = cos(n*2pi/6) + isin(n*2pi/6), n [itex]\in[/itex] I
In the last equation, when n = 6, we have the same complex number as when n = 0, and when n = 7, we have the same complex number as when n = 1, so we keep repeating the same 6 complex numbers. For that reason, it suffices to say that n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.

So we have 6 distinct complex values, all equally spaced around the unit circle. Each of them is "a" sixth root of 1, but the principal sixth root of 1 corresponds to n = 0, and is cos(0) + isin(0) = 1 + i0 = 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K