Why is European Union so irrational in regards to trade with China?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The European Union's trade balance with China stands at -156.3 billion euros, yet the EU has opted to avoid trade protectionist measures, primarily due to China's substantial investments in EU bonds and euro-denominated assets. This reliance on foreign investment raises concerns about the EU's economic sovereignty, as it appears to be compromising its financial independence. In contrast, Japan's high public debt is predominantly held domestically, allowing interest payments to benefit its citizens, unlike the EU's situation. The discussion highlights the irrationality of the EU's trade policies and questions the long-term implications of such economic strategies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of international trade dynamics
  • Familiarity with sovereign debt and bond markets
  • Knowledge of economic indicators such as trade balance and public debt
  • Awareness of the geopolitical implications of foreign investments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of foreign ownership of national debt on economic sovereignty
  • Explore the implications of trade balances between major economies, focusing on the EU and China
  • Investigate Japan's economic model and its approach to public debt management
  • Learn about the effects of inflation on bond yields and real returns for investors
USEFUL FOR

Economists, policymakers, financial analysts, and anyone interested in the complexities of international trade and economic policy, particularly in relation to the EU and China.

Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
The trade balance between EU and China is -156.3€ billions, yet today EU agreed with China (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/20/uk-eu-china-summit-idUKBRE88J0QR20120920) to avoid trade protectionist measures. They keep doing this because China keeps buying EU countries' bonds and has many euro-denominated assets. I honestly think EU is selling itself, by giving money and economic power to foreigners. And this could be handled differently even with the debt EU countries have. For example, Japan is the country who has the most public debt to GDP (230% in 2011 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt), well ahead European Union's. But the difference is that Japan's debt is mostly owned by the Japanese (http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/MONEY/2012-01-08-PNI0101biz-ask-stevePNIBrd_ST_U.htm), so the interest money goes to their citizens.

The trade balance of China and US is also terrible for US. What is the West doing? Where does this irrationality come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting article I came across today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19667754
Perhaps the moment in Britain's decline that American policy makers should be focussing upon is 1956. During the crisis caused by an Anglo-French invasion of Egypt, the US stopped the fighting by threatening to pull the plug on the British economy.

It marked the end of Britain's ability to act as an independent global power, and it was the country's indebtedness to the US that caused it.
 
Tosh5457 said:
The trade balance between EU and China is -156.3€ billions, yet today EU agreed with China (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/20/uk-eu-china-summit-idUKBRE88J0QR20120920) to avoid trade protectionist measures. They keep doing this because China keeps buying EU countries' bonds and has many euro-denominated assets. I honestly think EU is selling itself, by giving money and economic power to foreigners. And this could be handled differently even with the debt EU countries have. For example, Japan is the country who has the most public debt to GDP (230% in 2011 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt), well ahead European Union's. But the difference is that Japan's debt is mostly owned by the Japanese (http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/MONEY/2012-01-08-PNI0101biz-ask-stevePNIBrd_ST_U.htm), so the interest money goes to their citizens.

The trade balance of China and US is also terrible for US. What is the West doing? Where does this irrationality come from?

What is their trade debt holdings of foreign nations vs debt out?

For example, $4.74 trillion of US debt was owned by foreign countries. And the US owns about $6.76 trillion of foreign debt.

http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/pages/tg1285.ASPX
 
Everyone is out of ideas as to who will fund more massive spending debt. China is handy and so having them buy the debt allows the leaders in the West kick the can down the road a little longer. The US prints its own money so it can monetize its debt at the cost of inflation. The EU may make moves in that direction as well.
 
Tosh5457:

German 10 year bonds offer 1,5% per year, while in the same time inflation should be round 2% (now it's 2,2%)

It means that effectively you would pay Germans 4,8% of your deposit in real terms for asking them to keep it for ten years. Do you consider that as a poor business for those in Europe? (not mentioning gains from increased trade exchange)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K