Why is goldstone's theorem incorrect in gauge theories?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of Goldstone's theorem in the context of gauge theories and spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum field theory (QFT). It is established that gauge symmetries do not satisfy the necessary conditions for Goldstone's theorem, specifically that a massive boson emerges instead of a massless one. The conversation highlights that local gauge invariance allows for the "eating" of massless Goldstone bosons, transforming them into longitudinal modes of massive vector bosons. Key references include the BCS model of superconductivity and Franco Strocchi's book "Symmetry Breaking."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Goldstone's theorem and its conditions
  • Knowledge of gauge symmetries and their implications in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of the BCS model of superconductivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of local gauge invariance in quantum field theories
  • Explore the Anderson-Higgs mechanism and its relation to Goldstone's theorem
  • Read "Symmetry Breaking" by Franco Strocchi for deeper insights
  • Investigate the role of Hamiltonian locality in the emergence of Goldstone bosons
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physics, and condensed matter physics, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for students studying gauge theories and symmetry principles in theoretical physics.

LedPhoton
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am currently studying spontaneous symmetry breaking in qft. Several textbooks I've read prove Goldstone's theorem under supposing that
1) There exists a continuous global symmetry under which the Lagrangian is invariant.
2) The vacuum state is not annihilated by the conserved charge(or, alternatively, a field has a non-zero vacuum expectation).

Later it is said that theories with a gauge symmetry do not satisfy these hypothesis and so the goldstone theorem is invalid. In fact, a massive boson appears and not a massless one.
My question is how does a gauge symmetry violate the two hypothesis. Since it is a local symmetry, it also contains the global symmetry(the transformation is independent of spacetime) and so it should have the same conserved currents and charges.
I am guessing this is why Higgs won the nobel prize xD
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LedPhoton said:
Hello, I am currently studying spontaneous symmetry breaking in qft. Several textbooks I've read prove Goldstone's theorem under supposing that
1) There exists a continuous global symmetry under which the Lagrangian is invariant.
2) The vacuum state is not annihilated by the conserved charge(or, alternatively, a field has a non-zero vacuum expectation).
These are the necessary conditions for spontaneous semmetry breaking.

Later it is said that theories with a gauge symmetry do not satisfy these hypothesis and so the goldstone theorem is invalid.
Which book says that? This is incorrect. Without those conditions the symmetry does not get hidden and the massless gauge (vector) bosons stay massless. However, local gauge invariance allows us the freedom to gauge away "the would be massless Goldstone (scalar) bosons" by simply redefining the fields in the theory by making a clever gauge transformations.
In fact, a massive boson appears and not a massless one.
Have you not heard Sidney Coleman famous saying :The gauge fields have "eaten up" the masselss Goldstone's bosons and become massive. The scalar degrees of freedom become the longitudinal polarization of the vector gauge bosons.
My question is how does a gauge symmetry violate the two hypothesis.
They don't.
Since it is a local symmetry, it also contains the global symmetry(the transformation is independent of spacetime) and so it should have the same conserved currents and charges.
And they do have the same currents and charges.Sam
 
I think in general there are many more conditions for Goldstones theorem. Physically the most important one is that of the hamiltonian being sufficiently local. For example the BCS model of superconductivity does not contain Goldstone bosons because the reduced hamiltonian considered by BCS is too non-local. That was quite a lucky coincidence as a true superconductor also has no Goldstone bosen. However in the latter situation this is due to the Anderson Higgs mechanism.
An interesting read on that topic is the book "Symmetry breaking" by Franco Strocchi.
 
Ok, I think I understand. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K