Why is holomorphic = left moving?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

Why does "holomorphic" have to be identified with "left-moving" (and not right-moving) in Polchinski's book, in chapter 2 (page 34)? The way I see it, a function of \sigma^0-\sigma^1 is like a function of x-vt so it should be "right moving". Am I missing something here?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That statement is made in eq. 2.1.13, and he comments on it in the sentence that follows. It is just a convention, and depends on how you choose to define the direction of increasing values in the coordinate system. If the direction of increasing values is towards the left, then the terminology makes sense.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Back
Top