1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why is it that in general geodesics are paths of stationary character

  1. Mar 20, 2006 #1
    Well since the denizens of the relativity forum don't like me, I thought I might ask here see if I get better replies.


    1) Why is it that in general geodesics are paths of "stationary character" rather than minimum?

    2) http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/3280/math30016nx.jpg

    I can't quite follow equation 11.16. Specifically how they differentiate dxm/ds in the denominator.
    Shouldn't be necessary, but for reference, the following page is here.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 20, 2006 #2

    nrqed

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    They have been mean?

    They impose that it's an extremum (functional derivative is zero) so it could be either a min or a max.

    They do not differentiate dxm/ds..they differentiate with respect to dxm/ds. You must treat the *entire* combination dxm/ds as your variable and differentiate with respect to it (So, calling the variable x, L is essentially [itex] {\sqrt{ g_{kn} x^k x^n}}[/itex]).

    Pat
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2006
  4. Mar 20, 2006 #3
    No they weren't mean. They just gave me the silent treatment.

    Thanks. It's a lot clearer now.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?