Why is My Voltage Lower than Standard Cell Potential?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of achieving the standard cell potential in a Galvanic cell setup using copper and zinc electrodes in copper (II) sulfate and zinc sulfate solutions. The user initially recorded a voltage of approximately 0.3 volts lower than the expected 1.1 volts, which improved slightly with additional filter paper strips in the salt bridge. Key factors affecting the voltage include the conductivity of the salt bridge, the concentration of zinc ions, and the principles outlined in the Nernst equation, which explains how ion concentration changes impact cell potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galvanic cells and electrochemical reactions
  • Familiarity with the Nernst equation and its applications
  • Knowledge of salt bridge functionality and conductivity
  • Experience with preparing and measuring molarity in solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Nernst equation and its implications for cell potential
  • Explore methods to improve salt bridge conductivity in electrochemical cells
  • Learn about the effects of ion concentration on electrochemical reactions
  • Investigate techniques for accurately preparing and titrating solutions to achieve desired molarity
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, electrochemists, and anyone conducting experiments with Galvanic cells or studying electrochemical principles.

Calle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have set up a Galvanic cell and used filter paper that is soaked in KCl as salt bridge. The electrolyte I used is 1M and the experiment is carried out in room temperature. However, I am unable to obtain the standard cell potential. The voltage values I obtained was lower.

I was thinking maybe the salt bridge is not good enough, so I added more filter paper strips. The voltage did increase, but I thought the salt bridge should not affect the results?

Is it impossible to obtain the standard cell potential? Could it be the resistance of the voltmeter? Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How far off are you? What two metals are you using?
 
try this http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/halfcell.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks!

I am using copper and zinc in copper (II) sulphate and zinc sulphate solutions. The voltage i obtained is about 0.3 volt away from the standard 1.1 volt after i added more layers of filter papers.

I tried to decrease the zinc ions in the solution by diluting the solution and the voltage increased. Why is that so?
 
Calle said:
I am using copper and zinc in copper (II) sulphate and zinc sulphate solutions. The voltage i obtained is about 0.3 volt away from the standard 1.1 volt after i added more layers of filter papers.

It could be that the salt bridge is not very conductive for some reason. Adding additional papers lowers the resistance of the circut.

Calle said:
I tried to decrease the zinc ions in the solution by diluting the solution and the voltage increased. Why is that so?

In this redox couple which metal is being oxidized (solubilized) and which is reduced? For the metal that is oxidized, the soluble ion of that metal represents the product of the reaction. How might removing (through dilution) the product of the oxidation (soluble metal ion) affect the reaction? Review the Nernst equation.
 
>>> Is it impossible to obtain the standard cell potential?

No, but if I can remember correctly this should only occur briefly. When both Copper and Zinc are both 1M in solution it should be at standard potential...as soon as the current starts running the concentration of one ion in solution increases while the other decreases...the moment that happens the observed voltage starts to change away from the standard potential (when you changed the zinc concentration in solution a similar effect occurred). As chemistree said the Nernst equation describes this.

If you are far off from expectations, it might be wise to check the copper and zinc solutions you are using for the inital voltage check (check the molarity of each with titration and very carefully prepare each at 1M for the initial voltage reading...probably this would be the source of error).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K