Why Is Nickel Losing Electrons in Electrolysis?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrolysis of nickel, specifically addressing why nickel is losing electrons at the anode. Participants explore the nuances of chemical notation and the assumptions regarding the oxidation state of nickel in the context of a chemistry problem.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the electrolysis process, stating that nickel should be losing two electrons as the anode.
  • Another participant agrees with the logic presented but questions the assumption of nickel being divalent.
  • A participant suggests that the issue may relate to how the states of the metal are represented in the problem.
  • There is a discussion about the correct formatting of the chemical notation for nickel ions and the potential quirks of the mastering chemistry platform.
  • One participant notes that the expected reaction format for nickel was not accepted, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the required notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the logic of the electrolysis process but express differing views on the assumptions regarding the oxidation state of nickel and the formatting requirements of the mastering chemistry platform. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the formatting issue.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings related to chemical notation and the specific requirements of the mastering chemistry platform, which are not fully clarified in the discussion.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63
mastchem_zpsb318b869.jpg


Okay, so that is the master.chem problem that I am struggling with.

I feel I understand what's going on... Nickle is the anode that should be losing two electrons. What am I doing wrong according to mastering chemistry?

I feel this is an issue with how I am writing things? Or am I missing the point here.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see nothing wrong about your logic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Damn, is it possible that I am messing up the states of the metal? =/
 
No, states look OK as well.

Just occurred to me - why do you assume M to be divalent?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
That's a very good point. However, when I do M^n+ + ne^- --> M(s)

it gives me the response of:

"
Incorrect; Try Again; 4 attempts remaining; no points deducted
Term 2: There is an error in your submission. Make sure you have formatted it properly.
"
 
Sorry, can't help you with the mastering chemistry - all I know is that people hate its quirks when it comes to input formatting.

M^n+(aq)? M^{n+}? M^{n+}(aq)? Space after comma? Just M^+?

Is there some other information given that could help decide about Mn+ charge?
 
Wow, how lame - what they wanted as the metal reaction to be defined as Ni^2++2e^--->Ni instead of as Metal.

I have no idea how that works out, but whatever.

Thank you very much for confirming my thought process. Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K