Why is P-Type Conductivity Limited in Transparent Conducting Oxides?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bilalarif
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductivity Metal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of p-type conductivity in transparent conducting oxides (TCOs), focusing on the localization of holes at the valence band edge and the influence of metal-oxygen bonding. Participants explore the implications of these factors on conductivity and the potential methods to enhance p-type conduction.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that holes are localized at the valence band edge, which is influenced by oxygen-2p levels, thus limiting p-type conduction.
  • Another participant challenges this view, suggesting that holes may be localized in a gap state close to the valence band edge and argues that hole localization does not necessarily limit p-type conductivity, citing examples from perovskite oxides.
  • A third participant points out that recent research on hole self-trapping provides insights that may contradict earlier understandings, questioning the assumption that covalency in metal-oxygen bonds reduces self-trapping.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the localization of holes and its impact on p-type conductivity, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific definitions of localization and bonding characteristics, and there are references to recent work that may not be fully integrated into the discussion.

bilalarif
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was reading about semiconductor transparent conducting oxides and I found this why p-type conductivity is limited in TCOs. But I could not understand its meaning please someone explain me how the holes are localized at valance band edge and how dominated by oxygen- 2p levels?

''Owing to the strong ionic nature of metal-oxygen bonding, holes are typically localized at the valence band
edge, which is dominated by oxygen-2p levels therefore limiting p-type conduction. Two methods have been
suggested to enhance the co-valency between metal oxygen bonding, thereby limiting localization:1 choosing cations having closed d-shells of energy comparable to that of the oxygen-2p levels (i.e., Cu+, Ag+, and Au+, especially when found in linear coordination with oxygen2), and choosing a structure in which oxygen adopts tetrahedral coordination''
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I do not think this statement is very precise. If holes tend to be localized, they would be localized in a gap state close to but not right at the valence band edge. It is also not true that hole localization limits the p-type conductivity. Take for example p-type conduction in perovskite oxides. In many cases it proceeds via hole conduction and these holes are self-trapped on oxygen sites and are derived from 2p states of oxygen.

Could you cite the source paper of this statement?
 
I think the sentence highlighted in red encompasses too many information and in fact recent work on hole-self-trapping brought new insights beyond 2004 at the time of writing this paper. In fact even the concept that covalency of metal-oxygen bond reduces self-trapping is questionable. Take for example rare-earth nickelates. The bonding between Ni and O has a clear covalent character, in spite of this hole trapping on oxygen occurs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
858
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K