I was reading a website that said the boundary of a set's boundary is equal to the first boundary. Visually, this makes sense for subsets of R1 and R2 because the first boundary will not have an interior (no ball about the points will fall into the boundary).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

However, the reading went on to say that the boundary of the rationals Q is R. This seems wrong to me so I am questioning the entire site.

Wouldn't the boundary of Q be Q? A ball of positive radius about any point in Q would contain both points from Q as well as irrationals from P. ddQ = dQ = Q (where d is boundary operator). The theorem at top does appear to hold but the example is messed up....no?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why is the boundary of the rationals (Q) equal to R?

Loading...

Similar Threads - boundary rationals equal | Date |
---|---|

I Can there be a bounded space w/o a boundary w/o embedding? | Jul 19, 2016 |

Vector fields transverse to the boundary of a manifold | Jun 21, 2015 |

Boundaries and boundary conditions | Jun 1, 2015 |

Need some help understanding boundary operator on simplicies | Feb 2, 2015 |

Rational Bezier Curve to Polynomial Bezier Curve Conversion? | May 20, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**