Why is the concept of potentials incompatible with relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter preet0283
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials Relativity
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
1 reply · 2K views
preet0283
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
please elaborate ..." particle quantum mechanics is valid in the nonrelativistic regime by definition ...it refuses to obey relativity ...this is not bcoz we write non relativistic hamiltonians bt the concept of potentials is untenable in relativity ...since it assumes the transfer of information at an infinite speed"what do we mean when we say that the concept of potentials is untenable
 

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the hydrogen atom problem in QM, in which you put the Coulomb potential in the Schrödinger equation. Now ask yourself what happens if the proton is moved suddenly? According to QM the electron knows about this instantly, without any retardation. For this reason the true merger between quantum theory and SR is not relativistic quantum mechanics, but rather relativistic quantum field theory, which does not use potentials.

I wouldn't agree with the part of the statement that says, "this is not bcoz we write non relativistic hamiltonians", because that is clearly part of the problem. And not surprisingly, when the relativistic Hamiltonian is quantized, you end up with a theory that makes more accurate predictions.