Why is the function f(z) = ¯z not differentiable for any z ∈ C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Applejacks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(z) = ¯z is not differentiable for any z ∈ C due to the failure of the Cauchy-Riemann (CR) equations. The analysis shows that the partial derivatives do not satisfy the necessary conditions: du/dx = 1 ≠ -1 = dv/dy and du/dy = 0 ≠ 0 = -dv/dx. An alternative approach using the definition of the derivative confirms this, as the limit of (f(z+h) - f(z))/h yields different results depending on whether h is real or imaginary. Therefore, f(z) is not analytic anywhere in the complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Basic knowledge of limits and derivatives in calculus
  • Concept of complex conjugates and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Riemann equations in detail
  • Learn about analytic functions and their characteristics
  • Explore the definition of complex derivatives
  • Investigate examples of functions that are differentiable in the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians, and educators seeking to understand the differentiability of complex functions and the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Applejacks
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that f(z) = ¯z is not differentiable for any z ∈ C.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Is it because the Cauchy-Reimann Equations don't hold?

Z (conjugate) = x-iy
u(x,y)=x
v(x,y=-iy

du/dx=1≠dv/dy=-1
du/dy=0≠-dv/dx=0
Edit: Is there another approach? Because the CR Equations is something we learned later on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Applejacks said:

Homework Statement



Show that f(z) = ¯z is not differentiable for any z ∈ C.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Is it because the Cauchy-Reimann Equations don't hold?

Z (conjugate) = x-iy
u(x,y)=x
v(x,y=-iy

du/dx=1≠dv/dy=-1
du/dy=0≠-dv/dx=0
Edit: Is there another approach? Because the CR Equations is something we learned later on.

Sure. Use the definition of f'(z)=lim h->0 (f(z+h)-f(z))/h. Show the limit is different if you pick h to be real from the limit if you pick h to be imaginary. That's really what the content of the CR equations is.
 
Last edited:
I think I get it now.

(f(z+h)-f(z))/h

(conjugate((z+h)-z))/h = h(conjugate)/h

If h=Δx, the ratio equals 1
If h=Δiy, the ratio equals -1.

Since the two approaches don't agree for any z, z(conj) is not analytic anywhere. Correct?
 
Applejacks said:
I think I get it now.

(f(z+h)-f(z))/h

(conjugate((z+h)-z))/h = h(conjugate)/h

If h=Δx, the ratio equals 1
If h=Δiy, the ratio equals -1.

Since the two approaches don't agree for any z, z(conj) is not analytic anywhere. Correct?

Yep, that's it. That's how you derive CR.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K