Why is the gravity of a neutron star stronger than that of its original star?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravity of a neutron star is not inherently stronger than that of its original star; rather, it is the result of the star's mass being compressed into a significantly smaller volume. While a neutron star retains the same mass as its progenitor star, its compact size allows observers to get much closer to its center, resulting in a much stronger gravitational force at a given distance. For instance, a neutron star with the mass of the Sun has a radius of approximately 9 km, producing a gravitational force at its surface that is about 1.76e11 times stronger than that of Earth. Additionally, gravitational waves are produced by merging neutron stars and black holes due to their compact nature, which allows them to orbit closely and emit significant gravitational radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron stars and their formation
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational forces and how they vary with distance
  • Familiarity with gravitational waves and their detection methods
  • Concept of mass-energy equivalence in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and formation processes of neutron stars
  • Study the physics of gravitational waves and their significance in astrophysics
  • Explore the mechanics of black hole mergers and their role in gravitational wave detection
  • Learn about the equations governing gravitational force, particularly in compact objects
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of compact celestial objects and gravitational phenomena.

Simon Peach
Messages
80
Reaction score
17
I've just watched a vid about jets of matter and neutron stars. It was stated in it that a neutron star is a star that's been compressed from say a sun sized star to the size of a city, every thing OK upto now. Then it goes on to say that it has, the neutron star, enormous gravity, this is were I started to think; why is the gravity stronger than the gravity of the original star? The neutron star holds the same amount of matter as the original star so shouldn't the gravity be the same albeit the matter is more compacted. Does the compaction have an effect on the gravity? If so why? Same for a Black hole, in this sense just a more compact neutron star.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Simple answer: The total gravity of a neutron star doesn't increase. At a given distance from neutron star you would feel the same gravity as you would from a main sequence star of the same mass. However, being more compact, you can get much closer to the center of a neutron without reaching its surface than you can the main sequence star, and gravitational force does depend on how far you are from the center. With a sun sized star the surface is some 695,000 km from the center and the g-force felt there would be 28 times stronger than at the surface of the Earth. A sun massed neutron star would be be ~9 km in radius and the g-force at its sufrace would be ~1.76e11 times stronger than on the surface of the Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom and unusually_wrong
So I was right in my thoughts that for a given mass regardless of it's compaction the gravity is the same. This brings up another query: Why is it only black holes colliding that is produce gravity waves that are detected? Is it because the said B/H have such a high density?
 
Simon Peach said:
Why is it only black holes colliding that is produce gravity waves that are detected? Is it because the said B/H have such a high density?

Yes. The gravity very far away from a black hole is identical to a star of equal mass. But when you compress all that mass into a very small volume you can get very close to all of that mass. The Sun, for example, is more than a million kilometers across, and if you were just above the photosphere you would still be more than a million kilometers from all of the mass on the other side of the Sun. Hence the gravity from that bit of mass isn't nearly as strong as the gravity from the points in the Sun near you. But when you compress everything into a small sphere perhaps a few dozen kilometers across, you're suddenly very close to all of that mass and the gravity is many orders of magnitude stronger.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
Simon Peach said:
So I was right in my thoughts that for a given mass regardless of it's compaction the gravity is the same. This brings up another query: Why is it only black holes colliding that is produce gravity waves that are detected? Is it because the said B/H have such a high density?
Theyv'e also detected gravitational waves produced by merging neutron stars.
As two objects orbit each other, they emit gravitational waves. This causes the system to lose energy and they spiral in towards each other. In most cases this is slow process. It speeds up and the energy of the gravitational waves increase as they get closer. The closer they get, the faster they orbit, the faster they orbit, the greater the energy lost to gravitational waves. Black holes and Neutron stars are so compact that they can get very close to each other before the actual collision and thus can orbit very fast, producing quite a bit of gravitational radiation.
 
Thank you all for explaining
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K