Why is the Majorana mass of a neutrino so big compared to the

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yyoon@fas.harvard.edu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Majorana Mass Neutrino
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the disparity between the Majorana mass and Dirac mass of neutrinos, referencing Prof. Vafa's paper (arXiv:0806.0102). It is established that left neutrinos and right anti-neutrinos possess small masses, while right neutrinos and left anti-neutrinos are associated with significantly larger masses due to the seesaw mechanism. This mechanism explains the smallness of the observed neutrino masses by positing the existence of heavy neutrinos. The confusion arises from the interpretation of these mass differences and the implications of Vafa's scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the seesaw mechanism in neutrino physics
  • Familiarity with Majorana and Dirac mass concepts
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics and neutrino types
  • Awareness of string theory implications in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Seesaw mechanism in detail
  • Explore the concept of sterile neutrinos and their role in mass generation
  • Study the implications of Majorana mass in neutrino physics
  • Review Prof. Vafa's paper (arXiv:0806.0102) for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in neutrino mass generation and the implications of the seesaw mechanism.

yyoon@fas.harvard.edu
[Moderator's note: Quoted-printable stuff NOT corrected. Sometimes I
correct small errors, but a) there are several here and b) it is not
obvious what the meaning should be. Please submit only 100% 7-bit ASCII
plain-text posts. Even if YOU can read something fancier, many readers
can't. -P.H.]

I read the abstract of Prof. Vafa's recent paper on string
phenomenology. (arXiv:0806.0102)
But, I don't really understand the following part:

"This effect can simultaneously generate a viably small =A5=EC term as well
as an acceptable Dirac neutrino mass on the order of 0.5=A1=BF 10^(-2=A1=BE0=
..5)
eV. In another scenario, we find a modified seesaw mechanism which
predicts
that the light neutrinos have masses in the expected range while the
Majorana mass term for the heavy neutrinos is =A1=AD 3=A1=BF10^(12=A1=BE1.5)=
GeV."

So, it seems that the Majorana mass of neutrino is much much bigger
than the Dirac mass of neutrino.
Why is it so? As far as I know, the mass of neutrino is very small.
But, how can this light neutrinos have so big Majorana mass? Or,
rather, as stated in the excerpt, is there something called "the heavy
neutrinos" different from the light neutrinos which I am familiar
with?

Or, rather, even though it's unlikely, is Prof. Vafa suggesting that
"another scenario" of his is incorrect, since it predicts a big
Majorana mass?

I am confused,

Youngsub.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yy...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
> Or, rather, even though it's unlikely, is Prof. Vafa suggesting that
> "another scenario" of his is incorrect, since it predicts a big
> Majorana mass?[/color]

It has nothing per se to do with string theory, but is a somewhat
standard part of folklore in neutrino physics. The *left* neutrino and
*right* anti-neutrino have small masses. The *right* neutrino and
*left* anti-neutrino, on the other hand, are usually stipulated to
have large masses. This is part of the See Saw mechanism and is used
to explain why the left neutrino (and right anti-neutrino) have such
small masses.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Recent papers on particle masses
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K