Why is the range of argument z

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alshia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument Range
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The range of the argument z in polar coordinates is defined as being greater than -π and less than or equal to π to avoid ambiguity in representation. This limitation arises from the need to ensure that each point in the complex plane is represented uniquely, preventing multiple angles from corresponding to the same point. The concept of a covering space, visualized as a corkscrew, is utilized to manage this representation, allowing for a single angle to represent each point on the complex plane. By restricting the angle θ to a range of less than 2π, we effectively eliminate the possibility of overlapping representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of covering spaces
  • Knowledge of the complex plane and its properties
  • Basic grasp of angular measurements in radians
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of covering spaces in topology
  • Learn about the properties of the complex plane and its applications
  • Study the implications of angle restrictions in polar coordinates
  • Investigate the relationship between rectangular and polar coordinates in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying complex analysis or polar coordinates will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in understanding the uniqueness of point representation in the complex plane.

Alshia
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Why is the range of argument z more than -∏ and less than or equal to ∏?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alshia said:
Why is the range of argument z more than -∏ and less than or equal to ∏?


Choice. You may as well choose any other range of length \,2\pi\, for it.

DonAntonio
 
Why DonAntonio is correct: (a longer answer)

Depending on the problem you are faced with, it may be more convenient to use rectangular or polar coordinates, that is, either z=x+iy=(x,y), or z=re^{i\theta}=(r,\theta). But with the polar coordinates, you have an issue, that can be resolved by using a covering space which can be visualized like a corkscrew but r goes to infinity (corkscrew is just r=1. All angles of \theta and all r>0 are represented exactly once on this covering space. Then, to work back on the wonderful complex plane ℂ, we project, so for instance the infinitely long corkscrew (r=1) projects to the unit circle on the plane. So usually we don't want more than one angle representing the same point on the plane, so we slice the covering space so that \theta changes by less than 2\pi. Thus for instance you can take any \theta_0, and do work with our polar coordinates for \theta_0<\theta<\theta_0+2\pi. This means that we had to remove some ray from the complex plane. Depending on where we want to work on the complex plane, we remove a ray far enough away from where we want to work. We can never make more than a full rotation in the complex plane without some trouble being caused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K