Why is the Symmetry Group of the 9j Symbol Isomorphic to S_3 x S_3 x S_2?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yoran91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Symbol Symmetry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The symmetry group of the 9j symbol is definitively isomorphic to the group S_3 × S_3 × S_2, as established in Edmond's 'Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics'. This is due to the ability to permute the rows and columns of the matrix representing the 9j symbol, leading to the conclusion that the symmetry group is the product of three permutation groups: two S_3 groups for the rows and columns, and one S_2 group for the transpositions. The subgroup of symmetry operations that excludes transpositions is S_3 × S_3, while including transpositions results in the full group S_3 × S_3 × S_2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically permutation groups
  • Familiarity with the 9j symbol in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of matrix operations and transpositions
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of permutation groups, particularly S_3 and S_2
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of the 9j symbol in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of transpositions in group theory
  • Review applications of symmetry groups in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in group theory, and students studying angular momentum in quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Yoran91
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I read in Edmond's 'Angular momentum in Quantum Mechanics' that the symmetry group of the 9j symbol is isomorphic to the group [itex]S_3 \times S_3 \times S_2[/itex].

Why is this? Can anyone shed some light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edmonds says,
we may permute the rows or columns in the matrix forming the 9-j symbol, or transpose the matrix itself...The symmetry group [is] the product of the three permutation groups of three, three and two objects respectively.
Likewise, the Wikipedia page on 9-j symbols describes it this way.
 
I don't see the full picture, yet.

Labelling the rows [itex]r_1,r_2,r_3[/itex] and the columns [itex]c_1,c_2,c_3[/itex], it's easy to show that the subgroups of the row and column operations are both isomorphic to [itex]S_3[/itex]. Since any row permutation does not affect the order of the [itex]c_i[/itex], its an element of [itex]S_3 \times e[/itex] and any column permutation is in [itex]e \times S_3[/itex] in the same way.

So the subgroup of all symmetry operations not containing a transposition of the array is [itex]S_3 \times S_3[/itex]. But how do you take the transpositions into account?

I see that relevant subgroup is [itex]S_2[/itex], but I don't see exactly how you go from [itex]S_3 \times S_3[/itex] to [itex]S_3 \times S_3 \times S_2[/itex] by taking the transpositions into account.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K