Why Is the Time Symmetric Interpretation Overlooked in Quantum Discussions?

[rocket123456]

How often I repeat it is entirely up to you. If you are tired of seeing me repeat my falsifiability point then stop using a non-falsifiable definition.

If you believe that it is falsifiable then simply stop avoiding my repeated challenge and post the experiment which, in principle, could be performed and the outcome of said experiment which would disprove it.

I already said time travel and the lack of free will to create paradoxes.

 

[Dale]

I already said time travel and the lack of free will to create paradoxes.

That isn't an experiment. That is a science fiction screenplay theme.

 

[audioloop]

Determinism should be viewed as religious fatalism.

your position.


-------

indeed falsifiable

He is using some philosophical definition

Popper (philosopher). falsifiability as the name of this criterion.
Popper, K. R. (1994). "Zwei Bedeutungen von Falsifizierbarkeit [Two meanings of falsifiability]". In Seiffert, H.; Radnitzky, G..

 

[joseph0887]

Thankyou for your answers, and interesting discussion.
I guess I would like science to have some philosophical input. Quantum Interpretations seem a rich ground, though I understand why many adopt the shut up and do the maths approach.