Why is the vacuum normalised to 1?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter madness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of the vacuum state in relativistic quantum field theory (QFT), specifically the interpretation of the expression <0|0>=1. Participants explore the implications of this normalization on probability measurements and the nature of states in QFT.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of <0|0>=1, wondering if this implies that the probability of measuring the vacuum state is 1 and how this relates to the infinite number of states in the field.
  • Another participant suggests that <0|0>=1 indicates that measuring the vacuum state |0> yields |0> with probability 1, but notes that this does not apply to arbitrary states.
  • A third participant expresses confusion about the concept, initially thinking that the probability of measuring the vacuum should be 0, indicating a struggle with the concept despite prior experience in quantum mechanics.
  • A later reply reassures the confused participant that such confusions are common in the learning process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the normalization of the vacuum state, with some confusion evident. There is no clear consensus on the interpretation of the normalization and its implications for probability measurements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention their background in regular quantum mechanics, suggesting potential differences in interpretation or application in quantum field theory that remain unresolved.

madness
Messages
813
Reaction score
69
I'm studying (relativistic) quantum field theory and have a very simple question. Take for example the real scalar field. My notes simply state that <0|0>=1 is a very natural normalisation. If I'm not mistaken, then this implies that the probability of measuring the vacuum state is 1. How is this to be interpreted? If the field has an infinite number of states then will the probabilities add up to an infinite number? Does a probability greater than one correspond to the measurement of more than one particle? I think not because multiple particles correspond to a single state.

Basically, I don't understand how the normalisation of states is to be interpreted in quantum field theory. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<0|0>=1 means that measuring the state |0> will yield the state |0> with probability 1 which is quite intuitive no?

The probability of actually measuring the stat |0> on any arbitrary ket is <0|psi> which is not necessarily 1 no?

This is just based off my knowledge from regular QM. If something changes in QFT then, disregard what I'm saying...
 
I'm pretty sure you're right and I was just being stupid. At first I was thinking "shouldn't the probability that you measure nothing (the vacuum) be 0?". You'd think with this being my 4th quantum mechanics course I would know this. Oh well.
 
Don't worry, these little confusions happen to the best of us. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K