Why is the wavefront error non-zero at the image plane in Zemax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pintu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors Wavefront
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the non-zero wavefront error observed at the image plane in Zemax optical design software. Users expected the wavefront error to be zero when propagating a plane parallel beam in air without optical elements, but found finite aberrations instead. The issue was identified as an artifact caused by not selecting the 'afocal image space' option in the system settings. When this option is enabled, the wavefront error aligns with expectations, confirming the importance of this setting in maintaining collimation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wavefront maps in optical design
  • Familiarity with Zemax optical design software
  • Knowledge of aberrations in optical systems
  • Experience with collimated beam propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the 'afocal image space' option in Zemax settings
  • Learn about wavefront aberrations and their implications in optical design
  • Investigate the advanced POP features in Zemax for Gaussian imaging analysis
  • Study the effects of different optical elements on wavefront propagation
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, Zemax users, and anyone involved in optical system design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those troubleshooting wavefront errors in their simulations.

pintu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all
I was searching the web to clarify a conceptual issue regarding the wavefront map in Zemax optical design software. Wavefront map in Zemax is suppose to tell us about the aberrations in the optical system. If I propagate a plane parallel beam in air from the object (at infinity) to Image plane without any optical element in between, then I would expect the wavefront error to be zero at the image plane. But that is not so. For some strange reason, the wavefront aberrations become finite on the image plane. Please see the screen capture attached with this posting. Anywhere between the object and image plane ( e.g. the dummy surface shown in figure) the wavefront error remain zero. I am missing something very trivial here, which is driving me crazy. Could any of you please shed some light on this? Looking forward to hearing from you.
 

Attachments

  • WFE.jpg
    WFE.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 1,386
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ok I tried the same setup you did (all that I could duplicate, not sure of any changes in your settings that I could not see) and got the same >1000 waves. Not sure what is going on here. But I did then just put in a paraxial lens 100mm efl 50mm dia aperture and looked at the wavefront error at the foucus of this perfect lens and it is zero waves of error, like we should expect from a perfect lens. So there seems to be some issue with plano wavefront and the wavefront error in zemax. If your intent is to do some type of gaussian imaging analysis with laser beams you will need to use the advance POP features in zemax and this gets complicated fast IMHO. Michael
 
Dear Michael,
Thanks for your reply. I wanted to keep the optical beam parallel both in object space and image space. To ensure that I had to check on the 'afocal image space' option in Zemax's >system>general menu. That tell the Zemax to keep the beam collimated in the image space.The wavefront error that Zemax report is an artifact of not selecting this option.

Regards,
Pintu
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 184 ·
7
Replies
184
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K