Why is this 3D operator with degeneracies only giving me 2 eigenstates

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter struggling_student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Eigenstates Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the eigenvalue problem of a 3D operator represented by the matrix $$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$. The eigenvalues calculated are 1 (with degeneracy) and -1. The non-degenerate eigenstate corresponding to the eigenvalue -1 is $$\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\i \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}$$, while the degenerate eigenstate for eigenvalue 1 is expressed as $$\begin{bmatrix} a \\-ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}$$, indicating a two-parameter family of solutions. The discussion clarifies that degeneracy does not imply a unique eigenstate but rather a subspace of eigenstates, necessitating orthogonality for distinct vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
  • Familiarity with matrix representation of operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their manipulation.
  • Basic grasp of orthogonality in vector spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of degeneracy in quantum mechanics and its implications on eigenstates.
  • Learn about orthogonalization techniques, such as the Gram-Schmidt process, for generating orthogonal eigenvectors.
  • Explore the role of the determinant in solving eigenvalue problems, particularly in higher dimensions.
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of eigenstates in quantum mechanics, focusing on their applications in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in linear algebra, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of eigenvalue problems and degeneracy in operators.

struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
The matrix representation of a certain operator in a certain basis is

$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0
\end{bmatrix} .$$

The eigenvalue problem leads to this equation

$$0=det\begin{bmatrix} 1-\lambda & 0 & 0 \\0 & -\lambda & -i \\ 0 & i & -\lambda
\end{bmatrix} =-(\lambda-1)^2(\lambda+1).$$

So the eigenvalues are ##1##, ##1## and ##-1##. There is a degenacy and this means that there are two distinct states with the same eigenvalue but I would like to find all the eigenstates, generically denoted as ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix}##.

First, the non-degenerate ##\lambda=-1## leads to the following equation

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & -i \\ 0 & i & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

$$\therefore 2a=0 \ and \ b=ic.$$

So the nondegenerate eigenstate is ##\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\i \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}## because without the loss of generality we can set ##c:=1##.

Now, for the degerate ##\lambda=1## the equation is

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & -1 & -i \\ 0 & i & -1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

##\therefore b=-ic##, any value for ##a## will do so the degerate state is ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\-ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}##. How do I interpret this?

I expected to find two different vectors but instead I've got a two-parameter result. What is the degerate state? Is what I wrote not a valid operator? Am I mistaken in thinking that a degerate eigenvalue corresponds to exactly two distinct eigenstates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you put in two different values for ##a## you get two linearly independent vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and struggling_student
Your result makes sense. The eigenvector calculation needs to give you all the vectors in the subspace (two dimensional here) with the degenerate eigenvalue. However, if you want to have a set of orthogonal vectors, then after you pick the first value of ##a## you determine the second vector by enforcing orthogonality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and struggling_student

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K