I Why is this 3D operator with degeneracies only giving me 2 eigenstates

struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
The matrix representation of a certain operator in a certain basis is

$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0
\end{bmatrix} .$$

The eigenvalue problem leads to this equation

$$0=det\begin{bmatrix} 1-\lambda & 0 & 0 \\0 & -\lambda & -i \\ 0 & i & -\lambda
\end{bmatrix} =-(\lambda-1)^2(\lambda+1).$$

So the eigenvalues are ##1##, ##1## and ##-1##. There is a degenacy and this means that there are two distinct states with the same eigenvalue but I would like to find all the eigenstates, generically denoted as ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix}##.

First, the non-degenerate ##\lambda=-1## leads to the following equation

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & -i \\ 0 & i & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

$$\therefore 2a=0 \ and \ b=ic.$$

So the nondegenerate eigenstate is ##\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\i \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}## because without the loss of generality we can set ##c:=1##.

Now, for the degerate ##\lambda=1## the equation is

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & -1 & -i \\ 0 & i & -1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

##\therefore b=-ic##, any value for ##a## will do so the degerate state is ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\-ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}##. How do I interpret this?

I expected to find two different vectors but instead I've got a two-parameter result. What is the degerate state? Is what I wrote not a valid operator? Am I mistaken in thinking that a degerate eigenvalue corresponds to exactly two distinct eigenstates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you put in two different values for ##a## you get two linearly independent vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and struggling_student
Your result makes sense. The eigenvector calculation needs to give you all the vectors in the subspace (two dimensional here) with the degenerate eigenvalue. However, if you want to have a set of orthogonal vectors, then after you pick the first value of ##a## you determine the second vector by enforcing orthogonality.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and struggling_student
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top