Why is unitarity important in relativistic scattering processes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    S-matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the importance of unitarity in the scattering matrix for relativistic collisions, particularly in the context of quantum field theory (QFT). Participants explore the implications of probability conservation in scattering processes and the relationship between unitarity and the dynamics of quantum states.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the scattering matrix must remain unitary in relativistic collisions, suggesting that probability may not be conserved in this regime.
  • Another participant argues that probability must be conserved in each observer frame, which necessitates unitarity. They elaborate that violating probability conservation could imply a scenario where no outcomes occur, leading to the conclusion that in-particles cannot be lost and must materialize as something.
  • A further participant inquires about the conservation of probability in the context of a two-body to n-body scattering process within QFT, questioning whether probability remains conserved in such scenarios.
  • Another participant clarifies that unitarity is satisfied among quantum states in QFT, emphasizing that a quantum state represents the entire system rather than individual particles. They provide an example illustrating that the total probability of scattering outcomes must sum to one.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of probability in relativistic scattering processes, with some asserting that unitarity is essential for probability conservation, while others raise questions about its applicability in specific scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of unitarity and probability in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential dependence on specific definitions of probability and the dynamics of quantum states in QFT. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in demonstrating unitarity or probability conservation in the proposed scattering processes.

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why scattering matrix in relativistic collision still must be unitary?Because in relativistic regime,the probability is not conservable.
Thank you very much in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Please teach me this:
Why scattering matrix in relativistic collision still must be unitary?Because in relativistic regime,the probability is not conservable.
Thank you very much in advanced.

Probability must be conserved in each observer frame. This forces the requirement of unitarity.

If probability conservation were violated, there would be a positive probability that none of the outcomes happen. What could that mean? The in-particles would be lost. But this would just mean that the final state is the vacuum. But the vacuum is stable in time and because the dynamics is invertible, a final vacuum state implies a vacuum state at all earlier times. Thus in-particles cannot get lost - they must materialize as something.
Thus probabilities must sum to 1.
 
So,how is the probability conservable if we consider the process: 2 bodies--->n bodies scattering process.In this QTF theory process the probability is still conservable?
 
Unitarity is satisfied among quantum states.

In QFT, a quantum state is not associated with an individual particle, but with the whole system (vacuum + particles).

For example, unitarity ensures that
[tex]1 = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (\textmd{The probability of the initial two bodies getting scattered to be n bodies})[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K