Why Jupiter, Saturn and the Sun have a distinctive and sharp boundary?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the apparent sharp boundary of the atmospheres of gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn, compared to the fuzzier boundaries observed in Earth's atmosphere. Participants explore various factors that might contribute to this phenomenon, including atmospheric composition, temperature, telescope sensitivity, and the physics of gas behavior under gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the sharpness of the boundary may be due to temperature differences, where gases become visible or invisible at certain altitudes.
  • Others propose that the composition of the gases above a certain height could affect visibility, leading to a clear transition from visible to transparent regions.
  • There is a discussion about telescope sensitivity, with some arguing that a more sensitive telescope could reveal the "fuzzy zone" that is currently undetectable.
  • One participant mentions that the apparent sharpness is a matter of perception, noting that from a distance, the boundary can appear more distinct.
  • Some participants compare the gas giants' atmospheres to nebulae, questioning why nebulae appear fuzzy even from greater distances, suggesting differences in density and gravitational binding.
  • Another point raised is the concept of atmospheric scale height, with participants discussing how this might relate to the perceived fuzziness of the boundary in different planetary atmospheres.
  • There are mentions of the need for calculations to understand how features would need to be sized to be visible in images of these planets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for the sharp boundary of gas giants' atmospheres. Multiple competing views and hypotheses remain, with ongoing debate about the factors influencing visibility and perception.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the scale height of atmospheres varies among planets, which may influence the perceived sharpness of boundaries. There are also references to the limitations of comparing gas giants to nebulae due to differences in density and structure.

  • #31
Keith_McClary said:
I don't think the gradient is significant over 100km (maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying).
"Gradient" means "how fast it gets thicker". The atmosphere goes from "space" to thick and opaque in 200 miles.

Also, note that the 2.5 pixels thick I calculated is an upper bound. You can't see the atmosphere at 200 miles from Jupiter's clouds - it's too thin.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
russ_watters said:
how fast it gets thicker
(How fast it gets thicker)/thickness is proportional to g. This is the inverse of the scale height I mentioned.
 
  • #33
Keith_McClary said:
(How fast it gets thicker)/thickness is proportional to g. This is the inverse of the scale height I mentioned.
Sorry, I didn't see your post on scale height and now reading it, I think it's good information, and not incompatible with what I said: I gave the end points, and scale height tells us the shape of the curve. So I don't understand What your concern is. Could you try rewording/asking again?
 
  • #34
russ_watters said:
Ok, so no one bit on this, so I'll just have to give the answer: All the weather on Jupiter is in a region 31miles thick. Above that is a region 200 miles thick where the atmosphere thins out to almost nothing. So its atmosphere is only a few times thicker than Earth's (higher gravity = steeper gradient). Jupiter is 86,881 miles in diameter. So if you view a 1080p high def photo of it, where it fills the height of the screen, the entirety of that layer top will only be 2.5 pixels thick.
Technically it depends on how one defines an atmosphere for giant planets and stars that lack a well defined solid surface. until recently due to the lack of data the definition for where the atmosphere begins/ends was entirely arbitrary.

Now however the Juno mission has finally given us solid data on this via the Juno missions results from the key science mission dedicated to using Jupiter's gravitational field to parse out its internal structure and dynamics. Juno studies Jupiter's gravity field by decomposing it into a set of spherical harmonic series of gravity harmonics within Jupiter and using the resulting data to match model ensembles in order to narrow down and determine the required sructure. Key to this is the nonzero odd harmonics which indicate the extent of gravitational asymmetry resulting from internal flow dynamics within the planet. These gravity harmonnics are measured by using Juno as a test mass between the Earth Jupiter and measuring the delay signal transmission time between the probe and Earth respectively. From these gravity field results we now can reliably say that the weather layer of Jupiter extends down to at least around 3000 kilometers.

Furthermore while lacking the same precision as Juno's harmonic measurements the results from the Cassini mission's grande finale attempted the same technique and found that the Weather Layer on Saturn is probably three times deeper i.e. around 9000 kilometers deep. The difference in the Weather layer depths seems to be driven by coulomb drag induced by the extreme pressures within the planet that counteracting the differential rotation of the planet and leading to the fluids below acting as a rigid body.
For further reference read the feature article on Juno from Nature(2017)

It is important to note that inside gas giants quantum degenerate effects become increasingly important as more and more of the body becomes dominated by electron degeneracy pressure. This is why there is little size difference between gas giant planets and brown dwarf stars as the addition of more matter is counteracted by the degenerate compression of matter.

As for the question here since it seems to mostly be answered the only thing that comes to mind as add to this is the limb darkening effect within the Sun
 
  • #35
I have a feeling that the apparent outer layer of Saturn's atmosphere is due to clouds (as it is for Earth). Clouds have a fairly well defined upper limit and this is probably what we see. This link tells us that the clouds start about 100km below the tropopause. What happens above this layer will be invisible. So it's not the gases but the clouds that we see. The exponential decrease in density isn't what counts - it the thermal environment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K