Why mother's DNA and not mitochondria transplanted into egg?

  • Thread starter cave_cat
  • Start date
  • #1
41
0
I am referring to "3 parents baby" discussed e.g. here http://www.economist.com/news/leade...s/when-did-mitochondria-evolve/"]mitochondrial-diseases-should-be-permitted-law-powering[/url] . AFAIU they take the egg of mitochondria donor, remove its nucleus / DNA and transplant into it the mother's DNA, thus creating an egg with good mitochondria and, allegedly, correct / undamaged DNA.

So I am wondering, why don't they remove (destroy?) mitochondria and transplant new ones into mother's egg instead, not touching the DNA at all? Are there too many mitochondria in the egg to easily achieve that? Or what is the underlying rationale?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
3,511
4,182

Related Threads on Why mother's DNA and not mitochondria transplanted into egg?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
433
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
Top