Why must Quantum Computers be reversible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the necessity of reversibility in quantum computing, exploring its relationship with concepts such as the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Landauer Principle. Participants examine theoretical and practical implications of reversible versus irreversible computations in quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the requirement for reversibility in quantum computers, suggesting a link to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
  • Another participant recommends researching 'reversible computing' and Landauer's principle for further understanding.
  • A different viewpoint indicates that while reversibility is generally advantageous for quantum computation, it is not strictly necessary in all models, such as cluster state computation and one-way quantum computers.
  • One participant elaborates on the Landauer Principle, discussing its implications for information erasure and energy dissipation in classical computing, suggesting that these principles may also apply to quantum computing.
  • It is noted that unitary transformations, which are fundamental to quantum operations, are inherently invertible.
  • A technical explanation is provided regarding the structure of quantum computations, emphasizing the need for reversibility to ensure meaningful output states from quantum registers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the necessity of reversibility in quantum computing, with some arguing for its importance and others suggesting that it may not be required in all contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which reversibility is essential.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted, including the dependence on specific definitions of reversibility and the varying implications of the Landauer Principle in different computational models.

Lovelace
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Although I've read many times that quantum computers are reversible, I am unable to find a understandable explanation as to why (this may be because I study Computer Science).
From what I've read, I assume that the answer is linked to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but I don't know how.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out 'reversible computing' in Wiki...and then follow the link to 'Landauer's principle'.
 
Try looking in "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang. First of all, reversibility is not always required, look at cluster state computation and the one-way quantum computer. My understanding is that for an ideal quantum computation, to take full advantage of all the resources you have access to, you want to start with N qubits and end with N qubits. If you don't do the computation reversibly, it essentially cost you qubits, which are coupled to your classical input and you lose out on some of the "quantumness" that makes a quantum computer worthwhile in the first place. In real life, it seems that losing out on some of those qubits is just the cost of doing business.
 
According to March 8, 2012 article in "Nature" (see citation below), the Landauer Principle has finally been experimentally verified.

According to the Nature article, Rolf Landauer in 1961 had "argued that the erasure of information is a dissipative process" and that a "minimal quantity of heat, proportional to the thermal energy and called the Landauer bound, is necessarily produced when a classical bit of information is deleted." Landauer was the first to connect the loss of
known information with a loss of free energy. "A direct consequence of this logically irreversible transformation is that the entropy of the environment increases by a finite amount"

According to an article by Michael P. Frank titled "Reversible Computing", information can never really be destroyed. Every clock cycle (that is, billions of times a second), a typical logic gate in today’s processors “overwrites” its old output with a new one. But, the information in the old output physically cannot be destroyed." ... "All this information, since it cannot be destroyed, is essentially pushed out into the environment, and the energy committed to storing this waste information (entropy) in the environment is, by definition, heat. "

The associated heat dissipation problem means that the "Landauer Principle represents one of the fundamental physical limit of irreversible computation." As noted in the Nature article, until now, the validity of the Landauer Principle "has been repeatedly questioned and its usefulness criticized (FN17–22). From a technological perspective, energy dissipation per logic operation in present-day silicon-based digital circuits is about a factor of 1,000 greater than the ultimate Landauer limit, but is predicted to quickly attain it within the next couple of decades (FN23,24)."

The cited experiment has verified that the ultimate Landauer limit is "real".
See: Antoine Bérut, et al., "Experimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics" Nature 483, 187–189 (08 March 2012)
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-landauer-dissipated-memory-erased.html
 
Unitary transformations are invertible.
 
A quantum computer requires an input register (I), and output register (O) and a set of extra qubits to serve as a work area (R). Suppose that a quantum calculation acts upon I and R to produce a result, which is then contained in a subset of qubits of I and R. The result could be "copied" to O by means of a set of cNot operations, but then O's state would be entangled with I and R, so, generally speaking, no meaningful result could be read from O. We would need to reverse the calculation on I and R, returning them to their initial states. Only this would leave O in a meaningful state. So the calculation would need to be reversible for this to work, i.e., it would need to be a unitary transformation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K