Why point particle interaction has UV divergence,but string interaction does not?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that point particle interactions in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) exhibit ultraviolet (UV) divergences due to momentum integration, while string interactions do not, as they involve integration over the moduli space of Riemann surfaces. This fundamental difference arises because string theory incorporates modular invariance, which lacks an analog in particle physics. The conversation also touches on the scattering of D0-branes, highlighting that while these pointlike objects may introduce short-distance divergences, the overall framework of string theory mitigates such issues through its unique integration methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) fundamentals
  • String Theory principles
  • Moduli space and Riemann surfaces
  • D0-branes and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration over moduli space in string theory
  • Explore modular invariance in the context of string theory
  • Investigate the implications of D0-brane scattering on UV divergences
  • Learn about the differences between point particle and string interactions
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory and string theory, as well as researchers exploring the implications of UV divergences in high-energy physics.

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why point particle interaction(QTF theory) has UV divergences,but string interaction does not have UV divergences.Because I think that calculating the probability amplitude of a process,we must sum(or integrate) over all possible value of momentum.So how we avoid the UV divergence?
Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Because I think that calculating the probability amplitude of a process,we must sum(or integrate) over all possible value of momentum

That is true in particle QFT, but not in string theory. What replaces momentum integration is an integration over the moduli space ("shapes") of Riemann surfaces, and this is substantially different to particle theory. One may loosely say there appears a UV cutoff for the momentum integration. Actually things are more complicated and the stringy way of integration is more than a cutoff, and thus cannot be expressed in terms of particle QFT supplemented by a naive momentum cutoff. Pertaining to the geometry of Riemann surfaces, there are notions like modular invariance which have no analog in particle physics, so string theory is "more" than just a collection of infinitely many particle theories. That's why it can do things that cannot be achieved in particle QFT.
 
One thing I have always wondered in this context is what happens when one talks about the scattering of D0-branes, which are pointlike objects. In that case, no smearing out of the interaction vertices occurs, as it does for extended objects like strings. So doesn't this bring short-distance divergences back into the game?
 
Orbb said:
One thing I have always wondered in this context is what happens when one talks about the scattering of D0-branes, which are pointlike objects. In that case, no smearing out of the interaction vertices occurs, as it does for extended objects like strings. So doesn't this bring short-distance divergences back into the game?

Yes, from open strings stretched between the branes, which become massless when the branes coincide. So in a sense these are on-shell divergences.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K