Why the Antisymmetry of Wavefunction for l = 1?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter c299792458
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Would someone please explain the following found on P. 125 of these notes http://www.hep.phys.soton.ac.uk/hepwww/staff/D.Ross/phys3002/PCCP.pdf?

>On the other hand, two [itex]π^0[/itex]’s cannot be in an [itex]l = 1[/itex] state. The reason for this is that pions are bosons and so the wavefunction for two identical pions must be symmetric under interchange, whereas the wavefunction for an [itex]l = 1[/itex] state is antisymmetric if we interchange the two pions. This means that the decay mode [tex]\rho^0\to \pi^0+\pi^0[/tex] is forbidden.

I don't understand why the wavefunction of [itex]l = 1[/itex] must be antisymmetric. Perhaps I have forgotten something?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The spin part is 0 x 0 which is symmetric. And the parity of an orbital wavefunction with angular momentum ℓ is (-), so ℓ = 1 is antisymmetric under interchange of the particles.