I've been working on a problem and I can't seem to figure out as to why the book wants you to use Lagrange's theorem. The question is "Prove that if k is an integer that is relatively prime to the order of a finite group, then the map x --> x^k is surjective." My idea was that since n and k are relatively prime, then ns + kt = 1 so that x = x^(ns+kt) which simplifies to x = x^(ks) so that x is the image of x^s and it is surjective. So where does Lagrange's theorem come into play?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why the need for Lagrange's Theorem?

Loading...

Similar Threads - need Lagrange's Theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Need clarification on a theorem about field extensions/isomorphisms | Dec 19, 2017 |

A Lagrange theorems and Cosets | Dec 16, 2017 |

I Does this theorem need that Ker{F}=0? | May 1, 2017 |

Row and null complements of x; need clarity... | Oct 15, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**