Why this approximation is correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the approximation validity when a pole is near the imaginary axis. It explains that the proximity of the roots to the imaginary axis indicates that the term 2ζpωp is small. This smallness allows for the simplification of equation (1) to equation (2) by ignoring that term. The reasoning hinges on the relationship between the real part of the quadratic equation and the behavior of the roots. Thus, the approximation holds true under these conditions.
gaus12777
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
xcxcxcxcxcxc.png

Could you tell me the reason that if pole is close to the imaginary axis, (1) can be same as (2).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The fact that the roots of (1) are close to the imaginary axis tells you (from the real part of the quadratic equation) that 2ζpωp is small. Ignoring that part of (1) gives (2).
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K