MHB Why use point-slope form for linear equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the terminology and notation used in linear equations, specifically the slope-intercept form y = mx + b. The variable m represents the slope, while b denotes the y-intercept, although these symbols can vary by region, such as using k for slope in Russia. Participants express personal preferences for different variable names, like using s for slope instead of m. The point-slope form is also discussed, with the equation y - b = s(x - a) highlighted as a preferred format. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the flexibility in naming conventions within mathematical expressions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Why is y = mx + b called the slope-intercept form?

Why is m the chosen variable for slope?

Why is b the chosen variable representing the y-intercept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Why is y = mx + b called the slope-intercept form?
Because $m$ is the slope and $b$ is the $y$-intercept.

RTCNTC said:
Why is m the chosen variable for slope?

Why is b the chosen variable representing the y-intercept?
If you mean the variable names $m$ and $b$, they are such only in some circles. In Russia, for example, it is customary to denote the slope by $k$, though the intercept is still often denoted by $b$. You are free to call than any names, such as $y=\xi x+\aleph$.
 
I like s for slope. I guess b is ok for the y-intercept.

I like it this way: y = sx + b or f(x) = sx + b.
 
RTCNTC said:
I like s for slope.
This makes sense.
 
For the point-slope, I like y - b = s(x - a), where a and b are the coordinates of the point (a, b).
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top