Why vacuum has negative pressure?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of negative pressure in vacuum energy, particularly in relation to the Casimir effect. Participants explore both theoretical and experimental aspects of negative pressure, questioning its nature and implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether vacuum energy has negative pressure and if this is supported by theory or experiment.
  • Another participant asserts that negative pressure does not exist and claims zero pressure cannot be achieved.
  • A participant inquires about the Casimir effect, seeking clarification on its relationship to negative pressure.
  • There is a discussion about whether the negative pressure associated with the Casimir effect is absolute or relative to the laboratory environment.
  • One participant suggests that the calculated pressure can be negative when considering the magnitude of force, but acknowledges uncertainty regarding the Casimir effect.
  • Another participant explains the Casimir effect in terms of virtual particle-antiparticle pairs, describing how the effect leads to an attraction between closely spaced plates due to reduced energy states.
  • There is a parallel drawn between the Casimir effect and the behavior of ships in water, where proximity can suppress wave action and create attractive forces.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of mathematical understanding over belief in the nature of vacuum states and boundary conditions in quantum electrodynamics (QED).
  • One participant mentions the Newton's third law as a possible explanation for negative pressure in vacuum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of negative pressure, particularly in relation to the Casimir effect. No consensus is reached regarding whether negative pressure is absolute or relative, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of pressure and vacuum states, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical interpretations of the Casimir effect.

scope
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hi,

does anyone know why vacuum energy has negative pressure?
is it only experimental or it is theoretical too?

i also wonder if the negative pressure of the Casimir effect is absolutely negative or if it is relatively negative relatively to the rest of the laboratory?

i would be grateful for any reply!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing like negative pressure.
Furthermore, it is impossible to achieve zero pressure.
 
and what about the casimir effect?
 
i mean you said pressure can not be negative, but pressure seems to be negative for the casimir effect, so what is to be believed? is it absolute negative pressure?
 
Hi,
I think if you take the magnitude of the force, then the calculated pressure is negative. If you take the value of force together with its sign (which is negative), then pressure is positive.
But i am not not 100% sure about Casimir effect. So maybe some expert will advice you.
cheers
 
Thinking of the Casimir effect in terms of pressure, you can posit that the virtual particle-antiparticle pairs of the quantum vacuum have an effect on macroscopic objects. If you put two flat parallel plates of a Casimir device (other shapes have been used) very close to one another, you can suppress the emergence of virtual pairs of any wavelength larger than that separation. The Casimir effect (attraction of the plates) can be thought of as the reduction of "pressure" between the plates. There other interpretations, but you should be able to dig those up if you are interested. Casimir wanted to calculate the magnitude of the Van der Waals force between molecules of the materials comprising the plates. I don't know if he had any other motivation - you should be able to dig into that though.

There is an interesting macroscopic parallel in the behavior of ships. If you position a ship closely enough to another to suppress larger waves in the space between them, the wave action of the water on their out-sides will tend to force them together.
 
Last edited:
turbo-1 said:
There is an interesting macroscopic parallel in the behavior of ships. If you position a ship closely enough to another to suppress larger waves in the space between them, the wave action of the water on their out-sides will tend to force them together.

How strong is this effect?
 
cesiumfrog said:
How strong is this effect?
You can look it up. It is significant.
 
  • #10
scope said:
[...] but pressure seems to be negative for the casimir effect, so what is to be believed? is it absolute negative pressure?

Don't "believe" anything -- work through the math... :-)

The vacuum state is just the lowest-energy state for a particular Hamiltonian
and boundary conditions. It's misleading to think that the "vacuum" of infinite
spatial extent is somehow the same as the "vacuum" between two parallel
conducting plates. In QED those cases are significantly different.

With the Casimir effect, the boundary conditions at the plates mean there's
fewer possible EM modes when the plates are closer together, hence less energy.
That manifests as a force pushing the plates together since the system will try to
move towards a lower energy state.
 
  • #11
turbo-1 said:
You can look it up.
Do you recommend any particular place to attempt so? The most I found so far was the wikipedia "Casimir effect" talk page, debating whether or not the effect between ships is a myth.
 
  • #12
As we know that vacuum is a place having nothing,therefore, the negative presssure may be due to the Newton third law !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K