Why weather apps show absolute pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pines-demon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmospheric physics
AI Thread Summary
Weather apps typically display absolute atmospheric pressure, which can obscure meaningful variations in pressure that are crucial for weather forecasting. Users argue that a differential pressure scale, with 1 atm set as zero, would better highlight these variations. The importance of pressure changes is emphasized, particularly for storm predictions, as opposed to absolute values. In aviation, adjusted altimeter settings are critical for accurate altitude readings, especially during landing. However, in everyday weather apps, the scale often makes it difficult to detect significant pressure drops, such as those indicating approaching storms. Some users suggest that a more effective approach would be to display the rate of pressure change graphically, rather than relying solely on absolute pressure readings. Overall, there is a consensus that current app designs could be improved to better reflect pressure changes and enhance user understanding of weather patterns.
pines-demon
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
946
Reaction score
782
When displaying atmospheric pressure, weather apps show absolute pressure. I understand that it is the definition, but usually the atmosphere is at 1 atm ##\pm## corrections of the order of 1% or 0.1%. Such changes are what matters. Would it not be better to use differential pressure put 1 atm at zero and show variations around that?

Here is an example for Paris:
Screen Shot 2025-05-31 at 21.50.19.webp

Clearly the the scale is trimmed to avoid this issue but it shows that we do not need such a ridiculous scale on the left.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the other hand, sometimes a precise absolute pressure reading is required.
Airports will report an adjusted (sea-level) altimeter setting - in the US, it is reported in inches. This is the altimeter setting that pilots in the US and Canada will use when flying below 18,000 feet (other countries have other "transition altitudes"). Above that, the "International Standard Atmosphere" altimeter setting (29.92 inches) is used and altitude is reported as a "Flight Level".
When you set your altimeter to that local adjusted (sea-level) pressure reported by the airport, your altimeter will report correct MSL altitude readings. This is particularly important when approaching an airport for landing and in instrument conditions (fog/clouds) when flying below the transition altitude.

On another point, even the difference between the absolute barometric pressure and the average pressure (for example, 29.92) is not the best indicator of an approaching storm. Rather, it is the how the pressure is changing. I have an old mechanical barometer hanging on my wall. And, although it is mostly an ornament, I do occasionally use it for a quick prediction. When I do that, I first tap the barometer to see if it changes. If the needle jumps up, the pressure is increasing. If it jumps down, that's an indication on impending inclement weather.
 
Last edited:
With a relative air pressure system, reported pressure would go negative in the eye of a cyclone, when flying, or when climbing in the mountains.

The formation of cloud is dependent on absolute pressure, temperature, and RH.
 
.Scott said:
On the other hand, sometimes a precise absolute pressure reading is required.
Airports will report an adjusted (sea-level) altimeter setting - in the US, it is reported in inches. This is the altimeter setting that pilots in the US and Canada will use when flying below 18,000 feet (other countries have other "transition altitudes"). Above that, the "International Standard Atmosphere" altimeter setting (29.92 inches) is used and altitude is reported as a "Flight Level".
When you set your altimeter to that local adjusted (sea-level) pressure reported by the airport, your altimeter will report correct MSL altitude readings. This is particularly important when approaching an airport for landing and in instrument conditions (fog/clouds) when flying below the transition altitude.
I understand its use in technical occassions but I am talking about apps for everyday life.
.Scott said:
On another point, even the difference between the absolute barometric pressure and the average pressure (for example, 29.92) is not the best indicator of an approaching storm. Rather, it is the how the pressure is changing. I have an old mechanical barometer hanging on my wall. And, although it is mostly an ornament, I do occasionally use it for a quick prediction. When I do that, I first tap the barometer to see if it changes. If the needle jumps up, the pressure is increasing. If it jumps down, that's an indication on impending inclement weather.
But that's my issue here, you need to see the change, but in my phone app I can barely see it dropping because a bad choice of scale.
 
Baluncore said:
With a relative air pressure system, reported pressure would go negative in the eye of a cyclone, when flying, or when climbing in the mountains.
A negative value is not a problem, we have that with temperatures already.
 
pines-demon said:
Clearly the the scale is trimmed to avoid this issue but it shows that we do not need such a ridiculous scale on the left.
This graph seems to provide what you ask for, namely a plot of the variation over time where people uninterested in the absolute pressure values just look at the curve to get a sense of how pressure varies over time and people who somehow benefit from knowing the corresponding absolute pressure can then read specific values off the scale.

Are you complaining that the graph include the extra numbers on the left? I mean, if the plot was made insisting that the scale should include zero pressure, then I would agree it would be ridiculous.
 
pines-demon said:
A negative value is not a problem, we have that with temperatures already.
That is another problem. Monotonic scales are easier than zero crossings. What would you recommend for the relative zero pressure ?

Zero absolute pressure is never shown on weather maps, only isobars that exist on the weather map are shown. The weather map pattern is the same, independent of the magnitude attached to the lines.
 
Baluncore said:
That is another problem. Monotonic scales are easier than zero crossings. What would you recommend for the relative zero pressure ?

Zero absolute pressure is never shown on weather maps, only isobars that exist on the weather map are shown. The weather map pattern is the same, independent of the magnitude attached to the lines.
I was thinking 0 should be at 1 atm or at least some average atmospheric pressure.
 
  • #10
pines-demon said:
the atmosphere is at 1 atm ± corrections of the order of 1% or 0.1%.

pines-demon said:
I was thinking 0 should be at 1 atm or at least some average atmospheric pressure.
The average atm pressure of Denver is .83 atm, so here is the plot for Denver

Graph0.webp


Those poor airless bastards :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #11
pines-demon said:
I was thinking 0 should be at 1 atm or at least some average atmospheric pressure.
We are not arguing about the plotted line or the isobars here, they will remain the same, only the numeric labels on the vertical axis or the isobars will change, leading to confusion over the sign, and which way is up.

So what do you have against simply writing the absolute pressure? Why must it be offset?

If it was offset, I would argue that it should be labelled with absolute pressure, so we would not need to record the critical offset that was used for each plot.
 
  • #12
pines-demon said:
But that's my issue here, you need to see the change, but in my phone app I can barely see it dropping because a bad choice of scale.
It sounds as though you want a dP/dt plot. Something showing the current mm/hour rate of barometric pressure change.
 
  • Like
Likes pines-demon
  • #13
Frabjous said:
The average atm pressure of Denver is .83 atm, so here is the plot for Denver

View attachment 361667

Those poor airless bastards :wink:
The thing is that this is what my app looks like:
IMG_1930.webp

The drop indicated a sudden thunderstorm, barely noticeable with this scale.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
.Scott said:
It sounds as though you want a dP/dt plot. Something showing the current mm/hour rate of barometric pressure change.
That would be great, do you know of websites that do that?
 
  • #15
pines-demon said:
The thing is that this is what my app looks like:
View attachment 361703
The drop indicated a sudden thunderstorm, barely noticeable that scale.
I'll give you that's a terrible scale (sometimes 1kpa, sometimes 2, all the same spacing?) but creating a brand new way of expressing pressure (and having to teach it to people) just as a workaround for one bad app seems like overkill to me. Better to just find/write a better app.

I have a couple of apps that I use and both say the trend in words but neither show it graphically. And I feel like pressure has somewhat been superseded by radar for short term forecasting.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
russ_watters said:
...creating a brand new way of expressing pressure (and having to teach it to people) just as a workaround for one bad app seems like overkill to me.
That's some bad app, Harry. (50th anniversary joke)
 
  • #17
pines-demon said:
The thing is that this is what my app looks like:
View attachment 361703
The drop indicated a sudden thunderstorm, barely noticeable with this scale.
Since I previously brought up Denver, here’s a page with it’s pressure.
https://barometricpressure.app/denver
I believe that you have an app problem, not a units problem.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
27K
2
Replies
93
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
4K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top