Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,029
- 3,324
There is no debate then because as you said He saidatyy said:But to disagree with the whole philosophy of Wikipedia is nonetheless a claim made in the post, and it is the biggest claim of the post.
There would be no debate if he just said, "Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source" (pure common sense).
So you agree that you were mistaken and there is no contention.ZapperZ said:Please note that, as I stated, and has been pointed out by several members, I'm criticizing the use of Wikipedia as the PRIMARY source of information. Stay in this forum for a while, and you'll find people using it as not only a primary source, but also as a learning material, as if this is a well-thought out textbook! This is what I am criticizing!