Wick's rotation on a complex vector space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Wick rotation within the context of complex vector spaces, particularly in quantum field theory (QFT). It clarifies that Wick rotation is not merely a geometric rotation but a formal analytic continuation of time from the real axis to the complex plane. Two primary applications are highlighted: vacuum QFT for evaluating Green's functions and many-body equilibrium QFT, where the statistical operator resembles a time-evolution operator. The conversation also addresses the misconception that Wick rotation can be treated as a simple rotation in a complex vector space with a conventional inner product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wick rotation in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with complex vector spaces and inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of Green's functions and Feynman diagrams
  • Basic concepts of many-body equilibrium quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Wick rotation in vacuum quantum field theory
  • Explore the relationship between Minkowski and Euclidean inner products
  • Learn about the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path formalism in QFT
  • Investigate the analytic continuation of retarded propagators in many-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, theoretical physicists, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of complex vector spaces and Wick rotation applications.

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no clue what this should mean. Usually the Wick rotation is a formal analytic continuation of time from the real axis to the complex plane. This has nothing to do with the underlying Hilbert-space structure of QM or inner-product spaces.

There are two standard applications of the Wick rotation in the Q(F)T literature. One is for "vacuum QFT" and the evaluation of all kinds of Green's and proper vertex functions in perturbation theory ("Feynman diagrams"). Here the Wick rotation is usually done for the time-ordered vacuum Green's functions, which are in this case where you calculate vacuum expectation values, identical with the Feynman propagator and thus also closely related to the retarded propagator.

The other application is in many-body equilibrium QFT, where the canonical/grand-canonical statistical operator ##\propto \exp(-\beta \hat{H})## looks formally like a time-evolution operator ##\propto \exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{H} t)## with ##t \rightarrow -\mathrm{i} \tau##. Here ##\tau \in (0,\beta)## and the bosonic (fermionic) fields are subject to symmetric (antisymmetric) boundary conditions, which comes from taking the trace to evaluate equilbrium expectation values, among them the Green's function. The corresponding imaginary-time (Matsubara) propagator is then the analytic continuation of the retarded propagator.

Alternatively you can do equilibrium QFT also in terms of the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path formalism (extended by a vertical part of the contour). For details, see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf

and references cited therein.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen
Heidi said:
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
Here is my guess on what on the intended meaning of this passage.

A Wick rotation on a Minkowski vector space changes the Lorentz "inner product" to a Euclidean inner product.

Now, assume that ##V## is a vector space over ##\mathbb{C}## with a conventional inner product ##\left<,\right>##, which is linear in one slot and conjugate-linear in the other slot. Let ##v'=iv## with ##v## in ##V##. Then, ##\left<v',v'\right> = (i)(-i)\left<v,v\right> = \left<v,v\right>##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: morrobay
thanks
i thought that the remark contained more than that...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
730
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K