A Wick's rotation on a complex vector space

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no clue what this should mean. Usually the Wick rotation is a formal analytic continuation of time from the real axis to the complex plane. This has nothing to do with the underlying Hilbert-space structure of QM or inner-product spaces.

There are two standard applications of the Wick rotation in the Q(F)T literature. One is for "vacuum QFT" and the evaluation of all kinds of Green's and proper vertex functions in perturbation theory ("Feynman diagrams"). Here the Wick rotation is usually done for the time-ordered vacuum Green's functions, which are in this case where you calculate vacuum expectation values, identical with the Feynman propagator and thus also closely related to the retarded propagator.

The other application is in many-body equilibrium QFT, where the canonical/grand-canonical statistical operator ##\propto \exp(-\beta \hat{H})## looks formally like a time-evolution operator ##\propto \exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{H} t)## with ##t \rightarrow -\mathrm{i} \tau##. Here ##\tau \in (0,\beta)## and the bosonic (fermionic) fields are subject to symmetric (antisymmetric) boundary conditions, which comes from taking the trace to evaluate equilbrium expectation values, among them the Green's function. The corresponding imaginary-time (Matsubara) propagator is then the analytic continuation of the retarded propagator.

Alternatively you can do equilibrium QFT also in terms of the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path formalism (extended by a vertical part of the contour). For details, see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf

and references cited therein.
 
Heidi said:
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
Here is my guess on what on the intended meaning of this passage.

A Wick rotation on a Minkowski vector space changes the Lorentz "inner product" to a Euclidean inner product.

Now, assume that ##V## is a vector space over ##\mathbb{C}## with a conventional inner product ##\left<,\right>##, which is linear in one slot and conjugate-linear in the other slot. Let ##v'=iv## with ##v## in ##V##. Then, ##\left<v',v'\right> = (i)(-i)\left<v,v\right> = \left<v,v\right>##.
 
thanks
i thought that the remark contained more than that...
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...

Similar threads

Back
Top