A Wick's rotation on a complex vector space

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no clue what this should mean. Usually the Wick rotation is a formal analytic continuation of time from the real axis to the complex plane. This has nothing to do with the underlying Hilbert-space structure of QM or inner-product spaces.

There are two standard applications of the Wick rotation in the Q(F)T literature. One is for "vacuum QFT" and the evaluation of all kinds of Green's and proper vertex functions in perturbation theory ("Feynman diagrams"). Here the Wick rotation is usually done for the time-ordered vacuum Green's functions, which are in this case where you calculate vacuum expectation values, identical with the Feynman propagator and thus also closely related to the retarded propagator.

The other application is in many-body equilibrium QFT, where the canonical/grand-canonical statistical operator ##\propto \exp(-\beta \hat{H})## looks formally like a time-evolution operator ##\propto \exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{H} t)## with ##t \rightarrow -\mathrm{i} \tau##. Here ##\tau \in (0,\beta)## and the bosonic (fermionic) fields are subject to symmetric (antisymmetric) boundary conditions, which comes from taking the trace to evaluate equilbrium expectation values, among them the Green's function. The corresponding imaginary-time (Matsubara) propagator is then the analytic continuation of the retarded propagator.

Alternatively you can do equilibrium QFT also in terms of the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time path formalism (extended by a vertical part of the contour). For details, see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf

and references cited therein.
 
Heidi said:
I read this in the wiki article about Wick rotation:

Note, however, that the Wick rotation cannot be viewed as a rotation on a complex vector space that is equipped with the conventional norm and metric induced by the inner product, as in this case the rotation would cancel out and have no effect.

I do not see why. could you help me to understand what would cancel.
thanks
Here is my guess on what on the intended meaning of this passage.

A Wick rotation on a Minkowski vector space changes the Lorentz "inner product" to a Euclidean inner product.

Now, assume that ##V## is a vector space over ##\mathbb{C}## with a conventional inner product ##\left<,\right>##, which is linear in one slot and conjugate-linear in the other slot. Let ##v'=iv## with ##v## in ##V##. Then, ##\left<v',v'\right> = (i)(-i)\left<v,v\right> = \left<v,v\right>##.
 
thanks
i thought that the remark contained more than that...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top